• jimyeni wrote: 92 points

    August 27, 2021 - Consistent with previous notes

  • jimyeni Likes this wine: 92 points

    April 23, 2021 - Yeah, solid for the price point, nothing to write home about

  • jimyeni Likes this wine: 92 points

    March 20, 2021 - Very good for the $88 I paid for it. Velvety and rich fruit with plenty of oak spice. A more modern wine that is very enjoyable.

    1 person found this helpful Comments (2)
  • sean7711 wrote: flawed

    September 10, 2020 - Flawed. Not sure what happened here, but the nose smells great, but taste is awful. Suppose it may been heat damaged since it was delivered in late July. Will reach out to Wine Access about this.

    1 person found this helpful Comments (3)
  • Tym4wine Likes this wine: 91 points

    August 1, 2020 - Gritty tannins. Smooth and long finish. This wine will develop nicely over time. Dark fruit, blackberry, blueberry and kirsch. Has a little bit of heat on the finish.

  • Badmonkey wrote: 94 points

    July 5, 2020 - Dark ruby fruit - currants/cassis, blackberry, dark raspberry, and a little blueberry. Really smooth mid-palate with a nice purity and solid depth/concentration - medium plus body. Nice vibrant flavors of dark berries, some spice/licorice, and a mineral/graphite component. Fairly long finish. Decanted for two hours and drank over a couple more. Improved with time but drinking well after the decant despite its youth. Drank next to the 2015 vintage which was better - bigger/fuller fruit. Nonetheless, the 2016 vintage is another nice vintage of this wine - no surprise of the 94 to 96 rating from WA and 95 rating from Dunnuck. As Kyle Janzen recently conveyed, the 2016 vintage is approachable young like the 2012 vintage which I can’t argue. 100% cab.

    1 person found this helpful Comment