Community Tasting Notes 13

• DJL41 wrote: 90 points

  March 6, 2024 - Very nice - stood up well to a pork dish

  Comment

• mflesh wrote:

  December 31, 2016 - Second of three bubbly enjoyed for NYE2016. This bubbly was good, but bubbles were lacking a bit. Strawberry and raspberry notes were present, and this one went very well while enjoying company for an NYE celebration. This probably would have not stood up to a dessert or anything significant if it was served with food and likely would have been overpowered. Still quite enjoyable, although not likely I'd pursue it for my collection.

  Comment

• Loren Sonkin wrote: 91 points

  September 28, 2016 - Value in Champagne? (Todd's): Another wine I liked more than the group. This was my WOTN. Strawberries and raspberries on the nose. A slight toast. On the palate, strawberries on orange citrus. Slightly sweet. Nice acidity. This is a lively wine with decent power.

  Comment

• winesteward Does not like this wine: 80 points

  January 15, 2015 - Rather astringent. Unripe raspberry and lemon water. Good length but very bitter. Not a good champagne.

  Comment

• CJM Likes this wine: 90 points

  October 19, 2014 - Clear, pale pink, small plentiful bubbles. Toasted almond, cherry, strawberry. Low acids, very low tannins. Short balanced finish

  Comment

Pro Reviews 2

Wine Definition

• Vintage N.V.
• Type Rosé - Sparkling
• Producer Pannier
• Varietal Champagne Blend
• Designation Brut Rosé
• Vineyard n/a
• Country France
• Region Champagne
• SubRegion n/a
• Appellation Champagne
• UPC Codes 026255110202, 3272220131209

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 32 (27%)
• Consumed 87 (73%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine