Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.
Manage SubscriptionsCommunity Tasting Notes 7
-
kostaslonis wrote:
March 15, 2023 - At Oinoscent, decanted and given blind to taste. Already told that this bottle was horribly stored for (possibly) decades in a room with heating pipes passing over it (and other bottles)
-/-
The wine shows fully developed/brick red color
In the nose, the wine shows fully developed color, overripe to dried black fruit notes, prunes, raisins, dates, chocolate and coffee notes, spice notes, clove
Palate shows medium intensity, medium body, the same flavor profile, coffee chocolatea, considerable warmth, black fruit in dried form, some acidity left, medium finish
Called this Shiraz from Australia, could not state vintage, but probably 20+
-//-
Upon seeing the bottle, it is incredible that is has survived for so long (a 1969 St Henri from the same place was vile) and the greatest compliment of its pedigree and winemaking. That being said, I think that the people responsible for its condition, should be thrown in the darkest cell drinking only stale Fosters and listening to horrible pop music -
yodamark Likes this wine: 94 points
July 18, 2021 - I will keep this note shorter as this bottle was not in the same stratosphere of the one consumed a few months back (99pts) . Which goes to prove the old adage that there is no such thing as great old wine, just great old bottles of wine. This bottle was similar mid shoulder level but a less soaked cork. But clearly not in the class. More browning on the edge, less central crimson, more pronounced older Penny smell and and a hint of sherry and dryness but i felt it would flower. And it did. it would never reach the heights of the earlier bottle but after 30 minutes it had fattened up, became more panaforte and chocolaty richer and more definitive as a great old Penfolds grange. it started to resemble what i wanted to see, smell and taste and was a lovely wine but on this occasion not as good as a previous bottle and outclassed on the day. ( C'est la vie- just for you Timmy)
-
yodamark Likes this wine: 99 points
October 31, 2020 - Well f#*K me. Words fail to express the significant class of Schubert era granges from the 60's. All the 60's vintages are superb to unbelievable. It's been 15+ years since I had a 67 and always preferred 67 bin 7 or the 66 grange over the 67 grange ( we are about to try a bin 7 soon with 54 treasure chest and 61 Margaux - stay tuned ). But in this case Timmy dragged it out to drink to celebrate a particular event. It was mid high shoulder and cork fully soaked and crumbling. But the first whiff and pour into the decanter immediately indicated we were in for a treat and in the presence of royalty and greatness. Seeing as my unbroken noble Italian heritage of still being a Count ( I said Count not . .!) from the 1400's and therefore requiring Family and friends to stand in my presence, in this case I had to become a humble servant in its presence and stand to attention . Belieing it's 53 years of age the colour was dark impenetrable deep red. It had that classy Penny nose. Chocolate sweet cherry and dark fruits that were brooding but slightly decayed. Panafort and sweet soaked walnuts. If you refer to my note on the 74 dry red 1 where my mate Peter broke landspeed records to get here to try it then that record was annihilated when he got a text asking if he would like a sip of it. I had just put the phone down and he knocked on the door. So what was it drinking like? - well I refer you to my opening 3 words. And therefore I remain speechless thereafter and that is virtually impossible for me. Thankyou Timmy .
-
KoalaHK wrote:
August 22, 2019 - Tasted at Penfolds Magill Estate, Adelaide. 40 Vintages of Grange: Jimmy Watson Trophy Winner. Dark and intense in the glass. It lacks a bit of sweetness. Enormous amount of tannin on the finish that tends to dominate. You'd be out by 30 years if you tried to guess this wine's age.
-
Edeon wrote: 85 points
September 15, 2017 - Too old for my tastes. Bit funky, earthy, dusty. Not much vanilla oak up front, but too much oak on the finish.
Pro Reviews 5
Add a Pro ReviewJamesSuckling.com
-
By James Suckling
6/8/2017 (link)(Penfolds South Australia Grange Bin 95, Australia) Subscribe to see review text.
JancisRobinson.com
-
By Jancis Robinson, MW
6/25/2011 (link)(Penfolds, Bin 95 Grange Shiraz South Australia Red) Subscribe to see review text.
-
By Jancis Robinson, MW
10/17/2008 (link)(Penfolds, Grange South Australia Red) Subscribe to see review text.
The WINEFRONT
-
By Campbell Mattinson
10/18/2007 (link)(Penfolds Grange Hermitage) Subscribe to see review text.
Vintage Tastings
-
By John Kapon
Top 100 Weekend, Year III, 1/3/2007(Penfolds Grange) Subscribe to see review text.
Wine Definition
- Vintage 1967
- Type Red
- Producer Penfolds
- Varietal Shiraz Blend
- Designation Grange
- Vineyard n/a
- Country Australia
- Region South Australia
- SubRegion n/a
- Appellation n/a
- UPC Codes 012354000049, 012354001275
Community Holdings
- Pending Delivery 1 (1%)
- In Cellars 54 (81%)
- Consumed 12 (18%)
Food Pairing
Who Likes This Wine
More About This Wine
Articles
- Wine1967 Penfolds Grange
- FamilyPenfolds Grange
- ProducerPenfolds
- VarietyShiraz Blend
- DesignationGrange
- CountryAustralia
- RegionSouth Australia
Add Articles
- Wine1967 Penfolds Grange
- FamilyPenfolds Grange
- ProducerPenfolds
- VarietalShiraz Blend
- DesignationGrange
- CountryAustralia
- RegionSouth Australia