Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Red

2002 Chris Ringland Shiraz

Shiraz

  • Australia
  • South Australia
  • Barossa
  • Barossa Range
(Add Drinking Window)
CT96 4 reviews
2002
Label borrowed from 2003
2003
Label borrowed from 2004
2004
Label borrowed from 1999
1999
Label borrowed from 2005
2005
Label borrowed from 1999
1999
Label borrowed from 1998
1998
Label borrowed from 1998
1998
Label borrowed from 1998
1998
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2010
2010
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2014
2014
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2016
2016
Label borrowed from 2016
2016
Label borrowed from 2016
2016
Label borrowed from 2016
2016
Label borrowed from 2017
2017
Label borrowed from 2017
2017
Label borrowed from 2017
2017

Community Tasting Notes 4

  • bobbubbabs wrote: 96 points

    October 31, 2015 - My favorite wine from a 20 vintage (1989-2008), two day vertical tasting of Chris Ringland's glorious Barossa shiraz. Despite its 17.5% alcohol level, the wine is a balanced powerhouse of fruit (but without the 'jammy' quality evident in so many young Aussie shirazes) and gripping (in the loveliest sense) tannins. Other favorites were: 1993, 2004, 1990, 2001, 1991, 1996 and 1998. Among the ones I found of less interest were: 1994, 2000, 2003 and 2006.

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • prdmil20 wrote:

    May 4, 2015 - Drinking well.. Still a lot of life left. Blackberry and chocolate.

  • jhngo wrote:

    September 10, 2008 - A Night With Chris Ringland (Pappas Brother Steakhouse, Houston, Texas): More showy and powerful of the bunch

  • Tigg wrote:

    September 5, 2008 - Either I just don't get it or the emperor has no clothes. Tasted both the 2001 and 2002 at a store tasting. The bottles had just come from a tasting done by RP, and Chris Ringland himself was there with them. Even though there was general agreement that at 7 and 6 years old these bottles were still not ready to drink, I didn't get any hints that they would ever be ready to drink. I didn't visible spit up when told that they would retail at ca. US$500/bottle. If these were presented to me at a blind tasting and I had been told they were $20/bottle, neither would have found there way to my cart. The 2001 was astringent; the 2002 went down a bit easier. They had great color, but only moderate body. Good complexity and long finish, but since the flavors weren't a pleasure, didn't need them to last long.
    On the chance that even after 35 years of drinking wine from all of the world, there is just something odd about my taste buds, and since there are no other published numerical scores with which to average mine, I wont put a number in the box. If I were to: 82 on the 2001 and 84 on the 2002.

    1 person found this helpful Comment

Pro Reviews 0

Add a Pro Review

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.

Manage Subscriptions
  • No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

  • Vintage 2002
  • Type Red
  • Producer Chris Ringland
  • Varietal Shiraz
  • Designation n/a
  • Vineyard n/a
  • Country Australia
  • Region South Australia
  • SubRegion Barossa
  • Appellation Barossa Range

Community Holdings

  • Pending Delivery 2 (1%)
  • In Cellars 148 (72%)
  • Consumed 56 (27%)

Food Pairing

No food pairings available.

Who Likes This Wine

100% Like It  1 votes

More About This Wine

Articles

Report a Problem

Close
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close