February 19, 2013 - Good for the price (4.99). My go to cheap wine. Fruity up front, slightly dry oaky finish. Not a showstopper but a decent cheap wine.
May 1, 2012 - It was not bad, with some red fruits and a little acidity that did not make it overly cloying.
December 23, 2011 - Ver fruity
December 23, 2011 - Very fruity
February 12, 2011 - Fairly exceptional for a $5 bottle of wine - as other posters indicate, rather fruity and sweet. That said, it's $5 and, comparing it against other wines in the same price range it is an excellent value. Makes a good wine for the hot tub, non-discriminating guests (i.e., the good kind of guests), or for an inexpensive wine for a work week meal. My initial impression of the wine is that it's basic but smooth, fruit is immediately noticeable on the palate. Back palate is clean but unremarkable. I'll keep a few of these in stock for guests.
January 1, 2011 - Good considering the price....a bit too sweet for a cab...
December 13, 2010 - Unremarkable, unstructured, way too fruity for a cabernet. However, makes a decent "house wine" for $5-6.
July 19, 2010 - Lots of fruit, a little too sweet, and not much structure, but very drinkable for $6. Would definitely buy again at this price point.
April 11, 2010 - Not as fruit-forward as I expected. Pretty oaky. Undistinguished but drinkable.
March 1, 2010 - Legends Wine Club: Not a whole lot to it. Blackberry, cherry, spice, and vanilla, a bit flabby and not much structure. Still, at it's pricepoint you can do worse. You can also do much better, but you can do worse. This wine was almost "fresh fruity" enough to have been a Beaujolais Nouveau! Not a good representation of a cabernet sauvignon, but I can see why their target audience enjoys it. 50+5+9+11+4