Wednesday, December 4, 2013 - I was anxious to try this after adoring the 2010 across a bunch of bottles, but the 2011 comes through in a big way. The 2011 is perhaps a bit smoother and softer around the edges than the 2010, which can get a little rough at times. The alcohol (15.5%) is incredibly well concealed. The wine is just so utterly enjoyable to consume. Huge, gorgeous aromatics of rich fruit, vanilla, and a supporting touch of herbs. Coats the glass but amazingly doesn't feel heavy. A remarkable achievement. I can't think of a better wine in the $35-$40 price range. A great alternative to overpriced Napa Cabs.
Post a Comment / View RobertDwyer's profile
Comment posted by jtinto:
12/6/2013 5:39:00 AM - Do you think these would benefit from a few years of rest? Or simply drink them in their glorious youth?
Comment posted by RobertDwyer:
12/6/2013 5:45:00 AM - No experiencing with what these taste like aged. The only data I have to triangulate is how well the Juan Gil holds up on the counter over night under a stopper. I think it's better the 2nd day. I'd treat the Clio like Caymus/SS: Enjoyable even on early release but can age nicely 5-10 years.
Comment posted by Eric:
12/7/2013 2:39:00 PM - Congrats on note #1000!