Fathers Day and this was very good after lunch. P-n-P, but it opened quickly with dark fruit, some vanilla, and moderate tannins. No signs of the fizz that others mentioned. So good we opened the 2nd bottle that was on hand.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Nice nose. Dark Fruit a little earthy. First taste I got a fizz? Dissipated after while. Wine showed structure and nice balance. Tannins a little too prominent. Maybe more time in the bottle. Overall a nice approachable bottle.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
One of my least favorite K but still delicious - started fizzy as other reviewers noted - opened up to vanilla, spice, Earth and unripe fruit - not bad for $30
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Spritzy on the palate when first opening, which is very strange. Certainly a fault on the producers part. This blows off with some time but really not a solid start. The wine itself is nice, very rich, good enough structure. Very modern in its flavors, chocolate, cloves, ripe fruits, plum, prune, some meaty/bloody notes which seem to be de rigueur in Washington State Syrah. Ready to drink now, can age longer though.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Tasted blind. White pepper, some stemmy qualities, red fruit. Very tight, good structure and balance. Powerful but not overdone. Very good. Will benefit from a few more years of cellaring.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Hot mess. Spritz on the palate at first. After 3 hours of air that’s gone. Now it’s just sharp, disjointed and unpleasant. Perhaps this bottle is flawed but other notes sound similar.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Day 2 review and it needs that and more. Menthol, spices, cedar and coffee beans. Still tight and not a lot of fruit showing. Acidity moderate. A hard wine to rate but right now around 88. I will revisit on day 3 and 4. Day 3 not much improvement. Agree with JACarucci on this one. Needs serious time and hopefully will come around. Some of the K wines drink great right out of the gate but this is not one. 88 is the max I would go on this wine and down the road not sure it will improve that much more.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
This bottle may have been flawed because it has a bit of carbonation on the palate. To correct this, I double decanted this bottle with vigorous shaking in between to release CO2. While I was initially turned off by this wine, I decided to officially rate it on day two because I enjoyed how it was showing even though it is very different than previous vintages.
Aromas of blackberry compote, tar, iodine, rubber, Indian spices. Palate is very well balanced, although flavor is indistinguished. Good structure and acid and alcohol is well integrated (in contrast to a few K Vintners wines I’ve had recently).
For the entry level single vineyard from K Vintners, this is a very interesting wine, despite its initially flawed characteristics.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Nice deep vibrant color. Getting dark fruit on the nose. Possibly chinese five spice? Tannins are still a little tight. Fairly fruit forward and well balanced.Nice fairly long finish. Nice wine especially for the price. Should age another 5-7 years well.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Despite what some other reviewers have said, I think this needs a good amount of time. Brambly black and blue fruit was suggested on the nose, but the palate hasn't filled in, and is seemingly dominated by high acidity. The palate is thin, but the hints of what's to come are present. Let this sit for at least a year or two
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
This bottle was a little more gamey and funky than the last, the fruit took a backseat to notes of coffee, chocolate, herbs and seared meat. We splashed decanted and gave about 45 before the first glass which wasn't enough air time to really let the wine come into it's own.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Very dark in the glass - deep purple but takes on a very red hue near the edge. Despite appearances the nose is pretty bright, offering red berry, notes of bitter espresso crema and herbs. A bit smokey, but the fruit is the real draw. It's light on it's feet too, very approachable after a pretty short decant. Notes of raspberry, lavender, campfire, and bitter chocolate - enough acidity and tannic structure without becoming more difficult than it should be.
I think it's reasonably better than the current CT score of 89, not quite the 90+ or whatever it scored though in WS or WA, but at $30 or so it's a pretty standout bottle. Definitely worth adding to you collection, either for the end of this BBQ season or next year.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Washington Wine Tasting; 6/29/2017-7/1/2017 (Woodinville, Seattle, Jet City): Sampled at the K tasting room in Jet City. Deep purple in color. Nose of spice, dried fruit, earth. Taste of spice, dark fruit... this is a big/rich syrah, especially at this price point. Bold long finish. An in your face Charles Smith syrah.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A friend and I tasted this at Charles Smiths’ Jet City on 4/14/17. It had an elegant, focused bouquet of mineral, blackberry and plum aromas. The palate was dry and astringent with lots of lift and minerality. This was far too young!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
2/24/2020 - Susaninaustin Likes this wine: 91 Points
3
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/16/2019 - DB Lawton Likes this wine: 91 Points
2nd bottle, good as the first
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/16/2019 - DB Lawton Likes this wine: 91 Points
Fathers Day and this was very good after lunch. P-n-P, but it opened quickly with dark fruit, some vanilla, and moderate tannins. No signs of the fizz that others mentioned. So good we opened the 2nd bottle that was on hand.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/30/2018 - UKCatFan Likes this wine: 90 Points
Nice nose. Dark Fruit a little earthy. First taste I got a fizz? Dissipated after while. Wine showed structure and nice balance. Tannins a little too prominent. Maybe more time in the bottle. Overall a nice approachable bottle.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/27/2018 - djs wrote: 89 Points
Give this 3 or 4 years in the cellar.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/22/2018 - Susaninaustin Likes this wine:
2.76
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/4/2018 - jjlgd wrote: 90 Points
I did not notice any fizz like other reviewers. Soft, round and easy to drink, went well with a grilled ribeye.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
5/16/2018 - Breaktheory Likes this wine: 91 Points
One of my least favorite K but still delicious - started fizzy as other reviewers noted - opened up to vanilla, spice, Earth and unripe fruit - not bad for $30
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
4/15/2018 - xScottx wrote:
Spritzy on the palate when first opening, which is very strange. Certainly a fault on the producers part. This blows off with some time but really not a solid start. The wine itself is nice, very rich, good enough structure. Very modern in its flavors, chocolate, cloves, ripe fruits, plum, prune, some meaty/bloody notes which seem to be de rigueur in Washington State Syrah. Ready to drink now, can age longer though.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/24/2018 - edog77 wrote: flawed
Cork obviously comprised w wine leaking. Oxidized wine w sour spoiled palate. So disappointed.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/21/2018 - Vinomeglio wrote:
Wife drank. Her comments, “I like the carbonation fizz i feel on my tongue with this. There is a hint of chocolate and tobacco that i like. Earthy.”
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/13/2018 - ziavino wrote: 92 Points
Aromas and flavors of black pepper, smoke, tar, and blackberry. This conceals its strength well, and is deliciously integrated already.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/11/2018 - Rani Likes this wine: 91 Points
Tasted blind. White pepper, some stemmy qualities, red fruit. Very tight, good structure and balance. Powerful but not overdone. Very good. Will benefit from a few more years of cellaring.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/4/2018 - Anonymous wrote: 75 Points
Hot mess. Spritz on the palate at first. After 3 hours of air that’s gone. Now it’s just sharp, disjointed and unpleasant. Perhaps this bottle is flawed but other notes sound similar.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/4/2018 - Steve Jaasund wrote: 60 Points
Awful. Fuzzies effect on the tip of the tongue
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/29/2018 - 3daywinereview.com wrote: 88 Points
Day 2 review and it needs that and more. Menthol, spices, cedar and coffee beans. Still tight and not a lot of fruit showing. Acidity moderate. A hard wine to rate but right now around 88. I will revisit on day 3 and 4.
Day 3 not much improvement. Agree with JACarucci on this one. Needs serious time and hopefully will come around. Some of the K wines drink great right out of the gate but this is not one. 88 is the max I would go on this wine and down the road not sure it will improve that much more.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/28/2018 - deetz Likes this wine: 91 Points
This bottle may have been flawed because it has a bit of carbonation on the palate. To correct this, I double decanted this bottle with vigorous shaking in between to release CO2. While I was initially turned off by this wine, I decided to officially rate it on day two because I enjoyed how it was showing even though it is very different than previous vintages.
Aromas of blackberry compote, tar, iodine, rubber, Indian spices. Palate is very well balanced, although flavor is indistinguished. Good structure and acid and alcohol is well integrated (in contrast to a few K Vintners wines I’ve had recently).
For the entry level single vineyard from K Vintners, this is a very interesting wine, despite its initially flawed characteristics.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/11/2018 - UKCatFan Likes this wine: 91 Points
Nice deep vibrant color. Getting dark fruit on the nose. Possibly chinese five spice? Tannins are still a little tight. Fairly fruit forward and well balanced.Nice fairly long finish. Nice wine especially for the price.
Should age another 5-7 years well.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
10/7/2017 - JACarucci wrote:
Despite what some other reviewers have said, I think this needs a good amount of time. Brambly black and blue fruit was suggested on the nose, but the palate hasn't filled in, and is seemingly dominated by high acidity. The palate is thin, but the hints of what's to come are present. Let this sit for at least a year or two
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
9/14/2017 - Ewhite30 Likes this wine:
This bottle was a little more gamey and funky than the last, the fruit took a backseat to notes of coffee, chocolate, herbs and seared meat. We splashed decanted and gave about 45 before the first glass which wasn't enough air time to really let the wine come into it's own.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/8/2017 - brown57 Likes this wine: 91 Points
Drank at the Taylors. No detailed notes but enjoyed it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/6/2017 - ChrisWagner Likes this wine: 90 Points
Nice QPR WA syrah. More on the olive and tannic side than the funk of the Rocks.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/4/2017 - Ewhite30 Likes this wine:
Very dark in the glass - deep purple but takes on a very red hue near the edge. Despite appearances the nose is pretty bright, offering red berry, notes of bitter espresso crema and herbs. A bit smokey, but the fruit is the real draw. It's light on it's feet too, very approachable after a pretty short decant. Notes of raspberry, lavender, campfire, and bitter chocolate - enough acidity and tannic structure without becoming more difficult than it should be.
I think it's reasonably better than the current CT score of 89, not quite the 90+ or whatever it scored though in WS or WA, but at $30 or so it's a pretty standout bottle. Definitely worth adding to you collection, either for the end of this BBQ season or next year.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/5/2017 - RieslingFanatic wrote:
Spicy pepper, grilled meat, red and blue fruits, crushed rocks too. Savoury, sour palate, bright red fruits, balanced but tight.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/29/2017 - GoBlue2002 Likes this wine: 92 Points
Washington Wine Tasting; 6/29/2017-7/1/2017 (Woodinville, Seattle, Jet City): Sampled at the K tasting room in Jet City.
Deep purple in color. Nose of spice, dried fruit, earth.
Taste of spice, dark fruit... this is a big/rich syrah, especially at this price point. Bold long finish.
An in your face Charles Smith syrah.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/14/2017 - garambler wrote: 89 Points
A friend and I tasted this at Charles Smiths’ Jet City on 4/14/17. It had an elegant, focused bouquet of mineral, blackberry and plum aromas. The palate was dry and astringent with lots of lift and minerality. This was far too young!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment