1996 Chateau Musar

Community Tasting Notes (79) Avg Score: 90.1 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View NickBurwood's profile
  • Report Issue

  4/9/2023 - NickBurwood Likes this wine: 92 Points

  From magnum.
  Perfectly mature (but precipice in view) with classic earthy, truffly nuances. À point dark hedge fruit and dusky tannins with integrated capsid acidity.
  Drink over the next 3 years max (or now if in smaller format).

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View forceberry's profile
  • Report Issue

  4/1/2023 - forceberry wrote: flawed

  The vintage 1996 was fairly normal for Chateau Musar with a cool, rainy winter and a mild spring followed by good flowering. The crop was quite large, resulting in fruit lacking a bit in power and concentration, which is why only the best lots were selected for the grand vin in this year, resulting in a noticeably smaller quantity of the wine in this vintage. A slightly higher amount of SO2 was used - during the racking process - as the wine seemed lighter and weaker than normal, making Serge Hochar wonder if the wine was protected well enough against oxygen. The blend is quite typical aka. one third of each Cabernet Sauvignon, Carignan and Cinsaut. 13% alcohol. Decanted for six hours before tasting the wine.
  
  Aged, old and very translucent appearance with a brown color of burnt sugar. The nose feels pungent with oxidized and Madeirized aromas of peanut butter and nutty rancio, some cooked cream tones, a little bit of soy sauce, light espresso tones, a hint of hoi sin, a Sercial-like touch of chopped walnuts and a faint green whiff of aldehydic sharpness. The wine is old and tired on the palate with a medium-to-moderately full body and flavors that are between oxidative and oxidized: chopped walnuts, soy sauce, some salty notes of rancio, a little bit of aldehydic salinity, light beef jerky nuances, a hint of espresso and a touch of peanut butter. The wine is high in acidity with rather resolved medium-minus tannins that slowly pile up on the gums. The finish is old, tangy and oxidative with flavors of soy sauce and aldehydic salinity, some nutty notes of rancio, a little bit of beef jerky, a hint of green apple slices and a touch of coffee grounds. The tannins make the wine end on a very slightly grippy note.
  
  Tasting this wine seven years ago, I wrote "...it might be that it is not that far from getting past its peak. Most likely the wine will hold good for many years, but a decade might be pushing it." - and it seems I was right. This is an atypically light vintage of Musar that didn't have enough stuffing to make old bones and it seems now the wine has gone over the hill and is falling apart. I know Musar is one of those wines that need a lot of aeration and can make almost magical rebounds with enough aging, but as this wine seemed to get only more tired and oxidative over the evening, I am pretty sure this wine is now just past its peak. Any remaining bottles should be consumed sooner rather than later.

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Gunakadeit's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/2/2022 - Gunakadeit Likes this wine: 93 Points

  Fairly tertiary. Smoked meat, hoisin, iodine, cigar box, campfire smoke. With time, orange peel, tangy red berries. Actually pretty nice with some air.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View winebonanza1's profile
  • Report Issue

  2/5/2022 - winebonanza1 wrote: 88 Points

  bright ruby on colour, no tannins, nice acidity with some dark berries. Forest floor, leather and tobacco.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Shiaxonna's profile
  • Report Issue

  1/20/2022 - Shiaxonna wrote: flawed

  Over the top/spoiled. A shame…

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 79 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.