A very good cerise. Solid aromatics of flint earth and plums, a whiff of tobacco. No funk. Harmonious palate with solid acidity. The finish is really excellent - long and savory with a saline quality. On day 2, horse poop comes out more clearly (in a mostly good way). Finish still great.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
It's time to dig into cellar to do some 10-year theme vertical tasting: 2018, 2008 and 2012 relative to this year 2022. I have 2018 Cailloux, 2012 En Camberlin and 2008 En Cerise. They all rated 96-98 range by JD.
Overall, i think 2012 is in a sweet spot to enjoy right now. 2018 is approachable surprisingly but will benefit for bottle aging for later enjoyment. 2008 is so ready to consume now with more "old school" style.
Ageability: 2008 En Cerise is still in the primary zone without noticeable secondary notes at age 14! I think it can cruise to 20. It has improved and more enjoyable since 2018 when I tried it. 2012 En Chamberlin at year 10 is more ready to drink than I had 2008 En Cerise in 2018. 2018 Cailloux is pleasant surprise that it's so approachable at year 4.
Flavor: They (including Horsepower and No Girls) all share the unique so-called "funk" (toward green/vegetal). Their intensity varies depending on vintages, vineyards and varietals (including grenache!). However, I notice the "funk" has mellowed down last few years (particularly more noticeable in their grenache). I tend to associate the "funk" flavor of those locally organic farmed little pink-hearted guava fruit from Southeast Asia. Some claim it's the soil effect; but I think using whole clusters with stem in maceration and harvest when the Brix resulting in less than 14% (i.e winemaking style and philosophy) could be even more important factor.
They all have brighter red tone with balanced acidity. It hits the palate with great tension and salinity lingering for seconds, which is great for food pairing. In general, the Cayuse syrahs are more "feminine" and elegant style than the big and darker profile of Northern Rhone-style Horsepower syrahs. The flavor profile is not berry-based driven but more complex and multi-dimensional.
Aroma: Aside from having the "funk" aroma, its aromatic is very complex and unique for most North American / European drinkers. It has complex tropical fruit/flower profile (like those sauvignon blanc) intermixed with Northern Rhone syrah profile. - 2018 Cailloux: More white pepper and bell pepper tone. The bouquet is more uplifting because of the 5% blending with viognier. - 2012 En Chamberline: More bacon and sweet herbs driven. - 2008 En Cerise: more earthy and mushroom driven.
Texture: The texture of the wine tricks you into thinking syrah from cool climate; but they are not grown in Winkler Zone II. The winemaking decision of biodynamic farming and keeping the ripeness in check with less than 14% alcohol for most of the time. They all pretty weightless gliding down the palate fairly seamlessly with the balanced acidity striking tension and excitement. Both 2018 and 2012 still have pretty vibrant; whereas 2008 is more matured. - 2018 Cailloux: great finish as the palate is coated with lingering sweet flower notes - 2012 En Chamberlin: The acidity has mellowed down and evolved to red cherry finishing - 2008 En Cerise: Matured and full body with earthy tone as acidity has integrated. For those who love aged Bordeaux wines may like drinking this wine at this drinking window.
Rating Range: 96-98; 96+
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
I can’t imagine this excellent wine could ever drink better. Excellent value at 150-ish bucks a bottle.
I thought; savory, supple, medium bodied, bordering on femininity(!) cept for the; dark chocolate cherry, plum, boissonberry, musk, muskee, funk, wood mushroom and frog underbelly.
Other ratings on here are too low. Put this in a bottle of French AOC and people would say it’s the best wine of their lives. It’s 96+, and I’m afraid to go higher because I’m a neophyte on the site. Looking at sourcing a case of a younger year. Enjoy!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Cayuse Syrah En Cerise Vineyard) Dark red violet color; redolent, dried berry, mineral, charcoal, dried lavender, light smoke, roasted plum nose; tasty, elegant, tart roasted plum, mineral, charcoal, tart black fruit, dried berry, Asian spice palate; a little chunky at this point, needs 3-4 years; medium-plus finish
(Cayuse Vineyards Syrah En Cerise Vineyard Walla Walla Valley) Dark in color. An aromatically compelling wine with smoke, ash, mineral, mushroom, crushed stone, umami and other savory notes that make it hard to take the first sip. A textured, fresh feel that pops across the palate. Not full of funk but still classically Cayuse. 100% Syrah. 296 cases produced.
(Cayuse Vineyards En Cerise Vineyard Syrah Barrel Sample Walla Walla Valley) An aromatic powerhouse with a cornucopia of red berries, smoke, violets, and game. One of the meatiest wines I have had from Cayuse. A slight let down in intensity on the very back end of the palate but should fill out with time. 100% Syrah. 14.1% alcohol. To be released in 2010.
NOTE: Some content is property of JebDunnuck.com and Vinous and RJonWine.com and Washington Wine Report.
10/22/2022 - ron m wrote:
A very good cerise. Solid aromatics of flint earth and plums, a whiff of tobacco. No funk. Harmonious palate with solid acidity. The finish is really excellent - long and savory with a saline quality. On day 2, horse poop comes out more clearly (in a mostly good way). Finish still great.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/22/2022 - pjhr Likes this wine: 93 Points
As delicious as the last bottle!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/17/2022 - pjhr Likes this wine: 93 Points
Wonderful mineral and earthy aromas with layers of complexity on the silky palate and long finish. Continues to drink beautifully!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/28/2022 - RhoneWho wrote: 97 Points
It's time to dig into cellar to do some 10-year theme vertical tasting: 2018, 2008 and 2012 relative to this year 2022. I have 2018 Cailloux, 2012 En Camberlin and 2008 En Cerise. They all rated 96-98 range by JD.
Overall, i think 2012 is in a sweet spot to enjoy right now. 2018 is approachable surprisingly but will benefit for bottle aging for later enjoyment. 2008 is so ready to consume now with more "old school" style.
Ageability:
2008 En Cerise is still in the primary zone without noticeable secondary notes at age 14! I think it can cruise to 20. It has improved and more enjoyable since 2018 when I tried it. 2012 En Chamberlin at year 10 is more ready to drink than I had 2008 En Cerise in 2018. 2018 Cailloux is pleasant surprise that it's so approachable at year 4.
Flavor:
They (including Horsepower and No Girls) all share the unique so-called "funk" (toward green/vegetal). Their intensity varies depending on vintages, vineyards and varietals (including grenache!). However, I notice the "funk" has mellowed down last few years (particularly more noticeable in their grenache). I tend to associate the "funk" flavor of those locally organic farmed little pink-hearted guava fruit from Southeast Asia. Some claim it's the soil effect; but I think using whole clusters with stem in maceration and harvest when the Brix resulting in less than 14% (i.e winemaking style and philosophy) could be even more important factor.
They all have brighter red tone with balanced acidity. It hits the palate with great tension and salinity lingering for seconds, which is great for food pairing. In general, the Cayuse syrahs are more "feminine" and elegant style than the big and darker profile of Northern Rhone-style Horsepower syrahs. The flavor profile is not berry-based driven but more complex and multi-dimensional.
Aroma:
Aside from having the "funk" aroma, its aromatic is very complex and unique for most North American / European drinkers. It has complex tropical fruit/flower profile (like those sauvignon blanc) intermixed with Northern Rhone syrah profile.
- 2018 Cailloux: More white pepper and bell pepper tone. The bouquet is more uplifting because of the 5% blending with viognier.
- 2012 En Chamberline: More bacon and sweet herbs driven.
- 2008 En Cerise: more earthy and mushroom driven.
Texture:
The texture of the wine tricks you into thinking syrah from cool climate; but they are not grown in Winkler Zone II. The winemaking decision of biodynamic farming and keeping the ripeness in check with less than 14% alcohol for most of the time. They all pretty weightless gliding down the palate fairly seamlessly with the balanced acidity striking tension and excitement. Both 2018 and 2012 still have pretty vibrant; whereas 2008 is more matured.
- 2018 Cailloux: great finish as the palate is coated with lingering sweet flower notes
- 2012 En Chamberlin: The acidity has mellowed down and evolved to red cherry finishing
- 2008 En Cerise: Matured and full body with earthy tone as acidity has integrated. For those who love aged Bordeaux wines may like drinking this wine at this drinking window.
Rating Range: 96-98; 96+
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/21/2022 - Rps228 Likes this wine: 95 Points
Had it 1/21.
Drink this now and be impressed!
I can’t imagine this excellent wine could ever drink better. Excellent value at 150-ish bucks a bottle.
I thought; savory, supple, medium bodied, bordering on femininity(!) cept for the; dark chocolate cherry, plum, boissonberry, musk, muskee, funk, wood mushroom and frog underbelly.
Other ratings on here are too low. Put this in a bottle of French AOC and people would say it’s the best wine of their lives. It’s 96+, and I’m afraid to go higher because I’m a neophyte on the site. Looking at sourcing a case of a younger year. Enjoy!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment