Opened and allowed to slow-O for 2 hours before serving, consumed over two nights. Cork came out cleanly. A decent amount of chunky sediment in the bottle; I didn't decant, but did pour through a fine mesh strainer.
On the first night, this was almost painfully tannic on initial pour (after 2 hours of air), but some vigorous swirling in the glass helped tame it and allow some nice fruit and earth to show through.
Night two was brilliant, with everything in balance. Dark fruits and strawberries, earth, spice and leather. This had it all.
No reason to think this won't keep going strong for another ten years at least; I think the CT drinking window is way off on this one. My current WOTY, which ain't bad for a $33 bottle.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Wouldn't change anything from my 10/30/2017 note. Bea's wines are idiosyncratic and often emphasize tannin and ripeness levels that don't particularly suit me.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
This is better integrated than a bottle drunk three or four years ago. At that time it was noticeably closed; it's now open for business, although it is still likely to improve. Menthol and violets on the nose; on the palate, black cherry, blackberry, and notes of violets, anise, and savory spices, with moderate tannins and strong acidity. The strong violet note makes this wine unique in my experience; it can't be mistaken for anything else. Although this is excellent on its own, it's better with rich food. This is a very good to excellent value at about $35.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
This is good, but still quite powerful with very robust tannins; the nose shows rich, ripe, dark fruits, anise, earth, dried floral notes, spice, hints of earth and leather. The palate is concentrated and has fairly intense tannins, more so than I recall. I did not pair this well tonight (pasta with roasted garlic marinara and Italian sausage) and the tannins stood out a bit so the wine seemed unbalanced. I think with a lower acidity, higher fat meal however this would be very good. It clearly has the structure to age for awhile and I think the fruit will hold up.
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Paolo Bea Umbria San Valentino) Very dark ruby color; appealing, black raspberry, minerally nose with a sense of pepper; tasty, minerally, roasted plum, light pepper, juniper berry, lavender palate; medium-plus finish
(Paolo Bea Umbria San Valentino) Medium garnet red color; redolent, hibiscus, tart cranberry, orange, VA nose; tasty, spicy, cranberry, balanced, smoky, dried salty plum, spicy, dried cranberry, mineral palate with good grip and acidity; approachable now; medium-plus finish 92+ points (declassified Sagrantino)
2/27/2020 - Fugu Me Likes this wine:
Opened and allowed to slow-O for 2 hours before serving, consumed over two nights. Cork came out cleanly. A decent amount of chunky sediment in the bottle; I didn't decant, but did pour through a fine mesh strainer.
On the first night, this was almost painfully tannic on initial pour (after 2 hours of air), but some vigorous swirling in the glass helped tame it and allow some nice fruit and earth to show through.
Night two was brilliant, with everything in balance. Dark fruits and strawberries, earth, spice and leather. This had it all.
No reason to think this won't keep going strong for another ten years at least; I think the CT drinking window is way off on this one. My current WOTY, which ain't bad for a $33 bottle.
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/26/2020 - Mh33 wrote: 88 Points
solid but perhaps past its prime
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/23/2019 - slanum wrote:
Wouldn't change anything from my 10/30/2017 note. Bea's wines are idiosyncratic and often emphasize tannin and ripeness levels that don't particularly suit me.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/10/2018 - RichardP wrote: 92 Points
This is better integrated than a bottle drunk three or four years ago. At that time it was noticeably closed; it's now open for business, although it is still likely to improve. Menthol and violets on the nose; on the palate, black cherry, blackberry, and notes of violets, anise, and savory spices, with moderate tannins and strong acidity. The strong violet note makes this wine unique in my experience; it can't be mistaken for anything else. Although this is excellent on its own, it's better with rich food. This is a very good to excellent value at about $35.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/14/2018 - jnewman77 wrote:
This is good, but still quite powerful with very robust tannins; the nose shows rich, ripe, dark fruits, anise, earth, dried floral notes, spice, hints of earth and leather. The palate is concentrated and has fairly intense tannins, more so than I recall. I did not pair this well tonight (pasta with roasted garlic marinara and Italian sausage) and the tannins stood out a bit so the wine seemed unbalanced. I think with a lower acidity, higher fat meal however this would be very good. It clearly has the structure to age for awhile and I think the fruit will hold up.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)