Very Good. Straw color. Minerals and a hint of citrus (lemon?) on the nose. Gentle, smooth up front; citrus finish mid-tongue. This is a surprisingly good value in my opinion. Borders on "Delicious" except for the lack of butter which I prefer in a chard.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
cloying flavors, ecess residual sugar (RS seems 9 grams/litre), adds a film around one's teeth suggests a low cost, mass market wine under $10. The region seems warm based on the ripeness of the grapes, which are almost tropically ripe in nature. Acidification seems probably, based on a certain "aspirin" taste.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
4/1/2013 - downby3 Does not like this wine:
Pucker! (way too astringent)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/11/2011 - Zuperdaave wrote: 85 Points
Very Good. Straw color. Minerals and a hint of citrus (lemon?) on the nose. Gentle, smooth up front; citrus finish mid-tongue. This is a surprisingly good value in my opinion. Borders on "Delicious" except for the lack of butter which I prefer in a chard.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/10/2011 - awinestory wrote: 59 Points
tasted blind ...
cloying flavors, ecess residual sugar (RS seems 9 grams/litre), adds a film around one's teeth suggests a low cost, mass market wine under $10. The region seems warm based on the ripeness of the grapes, which are almost tropically ripe in nature. Acidification seems probably, based on a certain "aspirin" taste.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment