WTSO Premium Monthly Wine Club Day 1: Elegant. Not as good as the Boizel but good overall. Spice, pie crust, light fruits, stems and lime. Short to medium finish. I find this very light overall. Certainly not bad but not going to pay more than $30. 89 points Day 2: Similar to day 1 and again not a bad Champagne but not one I would buy again. Lemon, lime, pie crust, mild spice and tropical fruits. Short to medium finish. 88 points Recommendation: Buy the Boizel from WTSO as it is outstanding.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A fruity, mixed berry style that is obviously mostly red grapes. M body with M to M+ acid, somewhat (but not excessively) rich, not especially bready/leesy, relatively. Decent quality and true to type, not my favorite style of champagne but for the $30 that I paid, a decent value for entry level champagne. ~6-6.5/10
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
6/25/2023 - BennyGamma wrote:
Tastes like a chardonnay. Not bad, but not the best at this price point
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/15/2022 - 3daywinereview.com wrote: 89 Points
WTSO Premium Monthly Wine Club
Day 1: Elegant. Not as good as the Boizel but good overall. Spice, pie crust, light fruits, stems and lime. Short to medium finish. I find this very light overall. Certainly not bad but not going to pay more than $30. 89 points
Day 2: Similar to day 1 and again not a bad Champagne but not one I would buy again. Lemon, lime, pie crust, mild spice and tropical fruits. Short to medium finish. 88 points
Recommendation: Buy the Boizel from WTSO as it is outstanding.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/22/2021 - afields wrote:
A fruity, mixed berry style that is obviously mostly red grapes. M body with M to M+ acid, somewhat (but not excessively) rich, not especially bready/leesy, relatively. Decent quality and true to type, not my favorite style of champagne but for the $30 that I paid, a decent value for entry level champagne. ~6-6.5/10
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/9/2020 - dlu Likes this wine:
Quick note: Bright and yeasty with a fine bead. Good, but perhaps not better than Roederer or other fine CA sparklers.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/23/2020 - ecola Likes this wine: 90 Points
Rich baked red apple and pear, subtle earthy feel, long toasty finish. Balanced between full bodied and crisp mouthfeel. Drink now.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment