Darker yellow with some brownish tinges. Good mousse. Aromas of baking bread, citrus, ripe apples. Some oxidation noticeable. Flavours showing ripe and bruised apples, lemon and lemon pithiness. Some grapefruit, apricots, and nuttiness. Nice wine overall. Tasty. Some good complexity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
New years eve dinner (At home): Tasted Marguet 2006 (disgorged autumn 2011) against Comtes de Champagne 2006 and Benoit Lahaye Violaine NV (disgorged 09/2016) Both Marguet and Benoit Lahaye are typical Grower style: Bone dry and oxidative style. Benoit Lahaye NV: Very complex but dominated by Extremely overripe apple and tons of hazelnut. Also toffee and coffee. Autolysis aromas are very subdued (almost no yeast aromas). The finish is extremely long and is highly dominated by the hazelnut. Delicate mousse. Fully developed. Drink now, nut suitable for further ageing I believe. 93+ Marguet 2006: Same style as Lahaye but less mature and still developing. Less oxidative notes at the moment. Slightly overripe apple, a little nutty (but not near Lahaye) and a little coffee. Creamy mousse. Can drink now but I would keep it another couple of years. 93+ Comtes de Champagne 2006: Completely different style. Usually Comtes is one of my favourites but as the 3. wine after Lahaye and Marguet Comtes was not a good experience. It seems like they work against each other in the same way as a wrong food/wine match. What a shame, Comtes de Champagne felt too rich, not complex and dominated by coffee. A lot more intense both in nose and palate. Creamy mousse. Can drink now but has further ageing potential. 91+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Clear light gold, medium mousse. Biscuit, apple, pear and lemon nose with just a hint of oxidation. Dry baked apple, lemon and cream flavours and a dry lemon and caramel finish.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Initial wiff of bread with some grapefruit/citrus. Still has great texture and acid. But, doesn’t seem to have a lot of secondary characteristics, and it seemed kind of simple for a 12 year old wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Marguet Champagne Grand Cru Brut Millésimé) Light yellow color with abundant, steady, tiny bubbles; appealing, ripe pear, yeasty, delicate, apple cream nose; creamy textured, zesty, very tart apple, chalk, mineral palate with tangy, medium acidity; medium-plus finish
NOTE: Some content is property of View From the Cellar and Vinous and ChampagneGuide.net and RJonWine.com.
10/4/2023 - OttawaB Likes this wine: 93 Points
Darker yellow with some brownish tinges. Good mousse. Aromas of baking bread, citrus, ripe apples. Some oxidation noticeable. Flavours showing ripe and bruised apples, lemon and lemon pithiness. Some grapefruit, apricots, and nuttiness. Nice wine overall. Tasty. Some good complexity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/31/2021 - Kim Gerner wrote: 93 Points
New years eve dinner (At home): Tasted Marguet 2006 (disgorged autumn 2011) against Comtes de Champagne 2006 and Benoit Lahaye Violaine NV (disgorged 09/2016)
Both Marguet and Benoit Lahaye are typical Grower style: Bone dry and oxidative style.
Benoit Lahaye NV: Very complex but dominated by Extremely overripe apple and tons of hazelnut. Also toffee and coffee. Autolysis aromas are very subdued (almost no yeast aromas). The finish is extremely long and is highly dominated by the hazelnut. Delicate mousse. Fully developed. Drink now, nut suitable for further ageing I believe. 93+
Marguet 2006: Same style as Lahaye but less mature and still developing. Less oxidative notes at the moment. Slightly overripe apple, a little nutty (but not near Lahaye) and a little coffee. Creamy mousse. Can drink now but I would keep it another couple of years. 93+
Comtes de Champagne 2006: Completely different style. Usually Comtes is one of my favourites but as the 3. wine after Lahaye and Marguet Comtes was not a good experience. It seems like they work against each other in the same way as a wrong food/wine match. What a shame, Comtes de Champagne felt too rich, not complex and dominated by coffee. A lot more intense both in nose and palate. Creamy mousse. Can drink now but has further ageing potential. 91+
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/12/2021 - David J Cooper wrote: 91 Points
Clear light gold, medium mousse. Biscuit, apple, pear and lemon nose with just a hint of oxidation. Dry baked apple, lemon and cream flavours and a dry lemon and caramel finish.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
6/15/2020 - GGinSF wrote: 92 Points
Big body, very rich. This was too young (for my tastes) in 2013, but six years later it's rounded out but still has great backbone. Excellent.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/18/2019 - dandiephouse wrote: 89 Points
Initial wiff of bread with some grapefruit/citrus. Still has great texture and acid. But, doesn’t seem to have a lot of secondary characteristics, and it seemed kind of simple for a 12 year old wine.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment