Not bad, but probably should have drank at least a year ago. I remember this being a little more peppery a couple years ago. A little flat, but drinkable.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Peppery, a slight spice on entry but a long enjoyable finish. Average nose but both big and bold. Decanted for two hours on day one and just as big and delightful the following day.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/1/2015 - MRichman wrote:
Petaluma Wine Group goes Themeless (The Bolan's): Purple fruit. Nicely pure and bright. Friendly, easy to drink.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/16/2014 - apham789 wrote: 88 Points
Not bad, but probably should have drank at least a year ago. I remember this being a little more peppery a couple years ago. A little flat, but drinkable.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/27/2013 - ddgd Likes this wine: 89 Points
Peppery, a slight spice on entry but a long enjoyable finish. Average nose but both big and bold. Decanted for two hours on day one and just as big and delightful the following day.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/25/2012 - rjonwine@gmail.com wrote: 90 Points
2012 Rhone Rangers Grand Tasting: 151 Wines Rated (Festival Pavilion, Fort Mason, San Francisco, California): Medium cherry red color; tart red fruit, floral, red berry nose; tart cherry, red berry palate with medium acidity; needs 1-2 years; medium-plus finish 90+ points
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment