Belle odeur et très présent en bouche, bcp de fruits et délicat effet de vieillessement. Pas complexe mais très agréable, surtout étant donné que c'est un californien.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Bought 6b for 9/b five years ago as a closeout from a local supermarket. This was the third bottle consumed, and it was a revelation. No decant; no sediment found; fragrant red fruit nose with some strawberry, bit of black cherry; mature fruit with very good mouthfeel. Last time I tried this (2014), it seemed relatively thin and simple; but this was much better--delicious! Reminds me of the elusive value of aging that many consumers probably rarely if ever experience. Glad I have more. Stored horizontally in a cool, dark basement since purchase. My evaluation: I've stopped giving scores on a "100-point scale" as I've become less convinced that they can be meaningful to others. I use a 4-category scale (perhaps with +/-)--not including flawed--which runs outstanding/notable/drinkable/poor. I considered this outstanding- when considering quality, age, and price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Bought 3b for 10/b during a wine department "reset" from a local chain grocery store four years ago. No decant, no sediment. Rich ruby color; fragrant red fruit nose, showing some oak; full bodied, very good mouthfeel. Enjoyed with rare ahi tuna. Stored horizontally in a cool, dark basement since purchase. My evaluation: I've stopped giving scores on a "100-point scale" as I've become less convinced that they can be meaningful to others. I use a 4-category scale (perhaps with +/-)--not including flawed--which runs outstanding/notable/drinkable/poor. I considered this notable+ when considering quality, age, and price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Forward dark, berry fruit without the supporting structure necessary to improve. Pleasant, but not complex or very interesting. Not improving with age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
9/29/2021 - aChave wrote: 87 Points
Has held up well over time. Good fruit, though less refined and fragrant that a classic Bourgogne. Lghter weight than some over-extracted examples.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/26/2019 - NicTheFish Likes this wine: 88 Points
Belle odeur et très présent en bouche, bcp de fruits et délicat effet de vieillessement. Pas complexe mais très agréable, surtout étant donné que c'est un californien.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/7/2019 - Oenecnist wrote:
Bought 6b for 9/b five years ago as a closeout from a local supermarket. This was the third bottle consumed, and it was a revelation. No decant; no sediment found; fragrant red fruit nose with some strawberry, bit of black cherry; mature fruit with very good mouthfeel. Last time I tried this (2014), it seemed relatively thin and simple; but this was much better--delicious! Reminds me of the elusive value of aging that many consumers probably rarely if ever experience. Glad I have more. Stored horizontally in a cool, dark basement since purchase. My evaluation: I've stopped giving scores on a "100-point scale" as I've become less convinced that they can be meaningful to others. I use a 4-category scale (perhaps with +/-)--not including flawed--which runs outstanding/notable/drinkable/poor. I considered this outstanding- when considering quality, age, and price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
9/23/2018 - Oenecnist wrote:
Bought 3b for 10/b during a wine department "reset" from a local chain grocery store four years ago. No decant, no sediment. Rich ruby color; fragrant red fruit nose, showing some oak; full bodied, very good mouthfeel. Enjoyed with rare ahi tuna. Stored horizontally in a cool, dark basement since purchase. My evaluation: I've stopped giving scores on a "100-point scale" as I've become less convinced that they can be meaningful to others. I use a 4-category scale (perhaps with +/-)--not including flawed--which runs outstanding/notable/drinkable/poor. I considered this notable+ when considering quality, age, and price.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/6/2017 - aChave wrote: 85 Points
Forward dark, berry fruit without the supporting structure necessary to improve. Pleasant, but not complex or very interesting. Not improving with age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment