Pretty cool and generous (but that is who he is) of Ramon to break out both the 2002 WS Pinots to share with Blake who was in town. So, we ended up with the 2002 Sonoma County and the Russian River bottlings, and for good measure, Blake brought the 1997 WS Rochioli so we had this cool trip of WS history to taste. For my taste in comparing the 2002s, I preferred the SC as it just drank better for me, for my palate. Where the RRV shows a more creamy red fruited profile with spice and tang, the SC has better delineation, offering both earth and acidity, herb, hard cherry candy and a bit of jamminess in the finish. No heat in these wines, no apparent oak. The early era WS are still delicious.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Cork broke so had to push through and pour through a filter...certainly a soft wine at this point with a trace of red fruit profile, though tasty for what it is.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Russian River Valley) Group's #5 (my #6) - faint raspberry and iodine nose that turns to chocolate after 30 minutes in the glass; solid, juicy, ripe raspberry and oak, with cocoa note; medium finish 88+ pts. ($47, 14.2%)
NOTE: Some content is property of Burghound and PinotReport and RJonWine.com.
11/11/2022 - Frank Murray III wrote:
Pretty cool and generous (but that is who he is) of Ramon to break out both the 2002 WS Pinots to share with Blake who was in town. So, we ended up with the 2002 Sonoma County and the Russian River bottlings, and for good measure, Blake brought the 1997 WS Rochioli so we had this cool trip of WS history to taste. For my taste in comparing the 2002s, I preferred the SC as it just drank better for me, for my palate. Where the RRV shows a more creamy red fruited profile with spice and tang, the SC has better delineation, offering both earth and acidity, herb, hard cherry candy and a bit of jamminess in the finish. No heat in these wines, no apparent oak. The early era WS are still delicious.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/11/2022 - M DU VIN Likes this wine: 92 Points
What a great surprise! The wine still has a very nice fruit profile and wonderful aromas.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/7/2020 - Vascular46 Likes this wine: 90 Points
Aged but still has fruit- better than I expected
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
12/15/2019 - hanasowner wrote: 86 Points
Cork broke so had to push through and pour through a filter...certainly a soft wine at this point with a trace of red fruit profile, though tasty for what it is.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
5/22/2017 - grumi62 wrote: 92 Points
great pinot, nice fruit, lasting
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment