Quite young looking. Rather spirity nose, with touch of spice. Very impressive (ok, no reason to sound quite so surprised ...). Bit fruity mouthful. Much more approachable than a vintage port with similar age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
7/27/2018 - king-bing wrote:
A lighter style of port but still very lovely. No hurry.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/18/2010 - king-bing wrote:
SE London South African offline (James P's house, Bromley, London): Perhaps not the best bottle of this. Fruit-cakey and alcoholic and little lacking in definition, but had enough acidity to keep some interest. I think I'm going off Port anyway.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/23/2006 - king-bing wrote: flawed
Slightly corked. Shame as had good underlying fruit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/5/2002 - andrewstevenson.com wrote: 88 Points
Quite young looking. Rather spirity nose, with touch of spice. Very impressive (ok, no reason to sound quite so surprised ...). Bit fruity mouthful. Much more approachable than a vintage port with similar age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment