Really just a brief note to say that this bottle was sound but not spectacular. Better than the previous 3 bottles and I note variable reviews suggestive of lack of cleanliness in this bottling. In fact that's been my experience with Niepoorts in 91,92, 94 and 97 despite generally tasting delicious up to about 5 years old. Anyway, this impression coincides with that of egaible 05/11/19 note.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
A wine with a questionable pedigree and I've also had my share of VA-riddled bottles. This, however, was clean and lovely to drink. Not very complex, with many light strawberries, cream and dried herbs, with some dry notes of leather. Definitely not showing the concentration or greatness expected from the vintage, but drinking surprisingly well and enjoyed very much.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/20/2023 - rwpalmer wrote: 90 Points
Really just a brief note to say that this bottle was sound but not spectacular. Better than the previous 3 bottles and I note variable reviews suggestive of lack of cleanliness in this bottling. In fact that's been my experience with Niepoorts in 91,92, 94 and 97 despite generally tasting delicious up to about 5 years old. Anyway, this impression coincides with that of egaible 05/11/19 note.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
10/30/2023 - ronnieroots wrote: 87 Points
A wine with a questionable pedigree and I've also had my share of VA-riddled bottles. This, however, was clean and lovely to drink. Not very complex, with many light strawberries, cream and dried herbs, with some dry notes of leather. Definitely not showing the concentration or greatness expected from the vintage, but drinking surprisingly well and enjoyed very much.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
6/5/2022 - Beusker wrote: flawed
Acetone
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/22/2022 - rwpalmer wrote: 89 Points
Similar to last bottle. Some acetone initially. Plummy nose. Rather simple. Chunky. Maybe not the cleanest. Disappointing in the vintage context.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/12/2021 - rwpalmer wrote: 89 Points
Opened just as the last bottle was finishing to see if this was any better. Definitely a step up though still quite mature and not exceptional.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment