Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(20)

  1. benjamin96

    benjamin96

    864 Tasting Notes

  2. fadincvaros

    fadincvaros

    118 Tasting Notes

  3. Putnam Weekley

    Putnam Weekley

    1,135 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (33) Avg Score: 91.1 points

  • Un stunner, C'est parfumé sans bon sens, Fruite vif, Succulent.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • 12/12. ten year rule, last bottle from a case mostly drunk in 2018-19. (<$30/b.) I made every effort to decant it clear, though ~5 oz. remained in the bottle—and they shall not be wasted!*

    NOSE: perfumed. Roses. Charred ginger. Cinnamon verum. Deep and involved. Iron. Tumbled gravel. I can't say I'm stunned, or even 'taken aback,' but it IS a gorgeous object. MOUTH: leads in sweet and juicy, entraining musk and tar. A complicated, active dialog takes place as it crests, between scorpion acidity and bitter, subterranean tannins. This structural contest carries on with apparent disregard for more tender botanical virtues: sinewy floral saps, mulled sage, raspberries. The abundance of the latter keeps the argument effective, or rather, irresistible. I do wonder about the slow curve of diminishing returns. I have little doubt this wine would survive another 10 years in a proper cellar, but I'm satisfied that this represents its utmost accomplishment.
    _________________
    *what's up with that? Consistent with other bottles, there is a solid material stratum that appears like discontinuous turbidity. The slightest agitation raises it into suspension. 1) I'm not afraid to drink it, but for purposes of documentation I wanted to keep it separate. 2) I interpret this as a marker of perhaps dogmatically minimal handling in the way of racking and filtering. 3) Whereas hard, crusted sediment in old Rhônes have demonstrated an effect of occluding flavor, often dramatically, I don't suspect this sort of buoyant, presumably leesy substance will act in the same way.

    TIME: bottle residuum tasted just like the clear decant. If I were forced to serve this, I would dismiss objections to inclusive sediment

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Beautiful aromatic florals on the nose - rose petal, sandalwood as patchouli incense, forest berries. Silky structure, pronounced tea-leaf and balanced. Elegant, translucent, inviting, lifted. Some development, probably doesn’t need more time. Yums!

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Back to the auctions (Bar Bould Sud): Man I love these wines. Baby Rayas. Of course not as complex as the main event, but there's a lovely elegance and tea leaves and fruit and I just very much enjoy these. Unfortunate they've jumped so much.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • 13.5% alcohol. G, S, Counoise, Cinsault, Merlot and more, this seems to be a real fruit salad ! Good dense cork of average length with no wine penetration. I decided to experiment and open this bottle 24h ahead, as advocated by some devotees of the producer. Very light colour, barely deeper than a sustained rosé, with some fading at the edge of the rim.
    The nose is probably less intense than I remember (from previous vintages), but it shows the usual characteristics of infused dried rose petals and macerated red berries.
    The mouth is better with a lively feel; grenadine in addition to the pot-pourri. No strawberry fortunately. This has some of the characteristics of a ruby Port (and I don't imply any oxidation). I wonder if the alcohol is not a good deal more than advertised; it seems to protrude a bit in the final.
    Probably more disjointed and less harmonious than on previous encounters, but I don't know how to apportion the responsibility between the vintage, the bottle preparation and an element of fatigue with the style now that the novelty is wearing off.
    Certainly distinctive, and I would not be without it, but a little goes a long way.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)

View all 33 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×