The 2016 Clos Labarde we tried, also from Total Wine, was indeed defective and undrinkable, so this wine might also be degraded. But this one is not obviously off, so I don’t know. In any case, the bottle we have strikes us as a poor example of St Emilion, far inferior to the 2016 Monbousquet or Clos de L’Oratoire. The wine is fruit-forward and jammy and lacking in structure.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
drank over two nights.. tight on opening.. darker fruit with some minerality/cedar.. stayed tight for the first two glasses.
second night opened up beautifully.. fruit was more integrated. a smoky minerality instead of just the minerality. much smoother tannins not as brash..just overall a better glass of wine although the core of the wine did not change much. but more complexity showed through.. this is a rebuy..
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/3/2024 - nisid wrote: 88 Points
Ripe plum. Silty tannins. Good amount of sediment. Should hold on for a few more years, but don't see it getting any more interesting. Drink.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/1/2023 - lemerick wrote: 87 Points
Ready to drink. Modern style Bordeaux. Seems a bit manufactured for my taste but nonetheless very enjoyable.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/26/2022 - Brendel Does not like this wine: 86 Points
The 2016 Clos Labarde we tried, also from Total Wine, was indeed defective and undrinkable, so this wine might also be degraded. But this one is not obviously off, so I don’t know. In any case, the bottle we have strikes us as a poor example of St Emilion, far inferior to the 2016 Monbousquet or Clos de L’Oratoire. The wine is fruit-forward and jammy and lacking in structure.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
11/19/2020 - Dad300 Likes this wine: 90 Points
drank over two nights.. tight on opening.. darker fruit with some minerality/cedar.. stayed tight for the first two glasses.
second night opened up beautifully.. fruit was more integrated. a smoky minerality instead of just the minerality. much smoother tannins not as brash..just overall a better glass of wine although the core of the wine did not change much. but more complexity showed through.. this is a rebuy..
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/5/2020 - dfusina wrote: 89 Points
Good. Little muted at first and missing some acid, but overall pretty good. I like the penguin review.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment