Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(123)

  1. platpeeps

    platpeeps

    1,460 Tasting Notes

  2. YagerWine

    YagerWine

    144 Tasting Notes

  3. atbarbar

    atbarbar

    361 Tasting Notes

More

Community Tasting Notes (413) Avg Score: 91.7 points

  • Left to air 30 minutes in the bottle. It is starting to show its age so we’ll drink our last bottle quickly.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • On opening I found this rather pinched and austere, with a bitter note on the finish, and suspected it could be a faulty bottle, but as it opened up gradually it blossomed from an ugly duckling into a beautiful swan. There were black fruits and liquorice, underpinned with pleasing mature tannins which melted away to leave a lingering and satisfying finish. This was linear and perfectly proportioned, with nothing unnecessarily overdone. Great winemaking. CHP 94 pts

    3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • I think this was an imperfect bottle that may have seen some heat damage at some point. That said, it was super pleasant mature claret that got better as it was open over the course of a couple hours.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • No detailed notes. Decanted about 1 hour and consumed over another 2 or 3. Very deep, almost opaque color with aromas of crushed leaves, cassis, tobacco, plums, and graphite. Mature and nicely integrated on the palate but seemed a bit angular, without the balance I expect from this estate. Perhaps it was an off bottle, though still delicious and classic in so many ways. Purchased with five others as futures and stored in my cellar since. The was the poorest of the 5 I've drunk to date.

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • A classy fully mature St. Julien from a regular bottle in a tasting with the 1994 and 1995, side-by-side. Very enticing nose of gravel, graphite, cherries and just a bit of flowers and italian leather. With that I mean very elegant leather, restrained not tending to horse or manure. Elegance is the trademark of this wine. It has very balanced acidity on the palate supporting its structure. Smooth tannins I think reveal that this wine is ready to go. I think it is at its peak. Both the 1994 and 1995 showed considerably younger. Both of them appeared not to be as elegant as the 89. The 1994 had more forward fruit, a nose of more intense leather and gravel, less cedar elegance. A very drinkable wine that can nonetheless be in the bottle for a bit longer. the 1995 appeared the less compelling of the 3, with some imbalance between its somewhat alcoholic fruit and its acidity living on two separate layers and not enough body to support either. It is a pleasant wine but somewhat (at this point) inferior to the other two. I look forward to compare again some of this wines.

    3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 413 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

Winedoctor

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 1998, IWC Issue #78, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Chateau Leoville Barton Saint Julien) Login and sign up and see review text.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    12/23/2012, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 91 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Opaque black red violet color; brett, dried tobacco, cedar nose; tightish, tart plum, cedar, black tobacco, pencil lead palate; needs 4-5 years yet; medium-plus finish
  • By Richard Jennings
    11/25/2011, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 92 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Very dark red violet color; nice, tart currant, herbaceous, cedar nose; tasty, a little tight, tart currant, cedar, herbaceous palate; medium-plus finish
  • By Richard Jennings
    4/17/2010, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 93 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Slightly bricking dark red violet color; camphor, menthol, cassis nose; tart cassis, menthol palate with good acidity; medium-plus finish 93+ pts. (needs 3-5 years; my #3 of the flight, group's #1 of 8 )
  • By Richard Jennings
    1/18/2009, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 93 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Opaque dark red violet color; lovely herbal, lavender and blackberry nose; tart berry, blackberry, black fruit palate with depth and sweet tannins; medium-plus finish
  • By Richard Jennings
    7/25/2008, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 94 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Group's #2 (my #2) – 13 pts; 1 1st place vote, 3 2nd place votes, 2 thirds, 0 last place votes – Dark garnet red color; lovely ripe cassis and plum nose; youthful palate of ripe plum, berry, cassis with a touch of mint; medium-plus finish

Rockss and Fruit

  • By Lyle Fass
    7/31/2007, (See more on Rockss and Fruit...)

    (Leoville Barton) Had this wine the other night. Nothing wrong with it. Good chunky Cabernet fruit, some earthy minerality, slightly soupy and stewed as it warmed up. Pretty balanced. Just an ok wine. Boring. The C-Span of wine. Could be the lameness of 1995 Bordeaux as I have never had one that has done anything for me at all.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    5/19/2007, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 92 points

    (Château Léoville Barton) Medium red violet color; nice, subtle, mushroom and truffle nose; a little tight yet, tart cherry, cassis palate with a coffee note, fairly plush; medium-plus finish (needs another 5-7 years)

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Winedoctor and Vinous and RJonWine.com and Rockss and Fruit.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×