CT users said it was past its prime now, and sure enough, it was. Not sure how much better it would have been a couple of years ago, though. Not much fruit on it, nose or palate. A bit thin, lean. Aged notes. Not terrible, but don't need to do that again.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Deep ruby. Layered with earthy woody notes against a backdrop of currants, cherries, smoke, vanilla, and cocoa. Offers good complexity, balance, integration, and a long, smoky finish. Well put together.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
7/30/2016 - SWHighlander wrote:
CT users said it was past its prime now, and sure enough, it was. Not sure how much better it would have been a couple of years ago, though. Not much fruit on it, nose or palate. A bit thin, lean. Aged notes. Not terrible, but don't need to do that again.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/5/2012 - ggkemp wrote: 84 Points
Totally unexciting, especially at the $20+ price...
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/7/2011 - Baron Slick wrote: 88 Points
Deep ruby. Layered with earthy woody notes against a backdrop of currants, cherries, smoke, vanilla, and cocoa. Offers good complexity, balance, integration, and a long, smoky finish. Well put together.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/30/2010 - DuVinMD wrote: 86 Points
You get what you expect from a very good Sonoma Cab, but does not stand out in terms of QPR.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/24/2008 - tmuhly wrote: 87 Points
A nice wine. Strong oak flavour, deep fruit on the nose (plum/dark cherry). Spicy, dry finish. Has good structure. 85-89
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment