Jake Barnes

Member #553,507 signed up 10/15/2017

This Member Is a Fan(42)

1 to 3 of 42

  1. brennan18

    brennan18

    112 Tasting Notes

  2. vvWine.ch

    vvWine.ch

    4,254 Tasting Notes

  3. boillatm

    boillatm

    373 Tasting Notes

More

Fans(23)

1 to 3 of 23

  1. AMC Eagle

    AMC Eagle

    1,148 Tasting Notes

  2. DJPop

    DJPop

    3 Tasting Notes

  3. boillatm

    boillatm

    373 Tasting Notes

More

Friends(12)

1 to 3 of 12

  1. brennan18

    brennan18

    112 Tasting Notes

  2. KillerJones

    KillerJones

    983 Tasting Notes

  3. Coastalnative

    Coastalnative

    103 Tasting Notes

More friends

Member since October 2017

This member's profile is not public.

  • 2009 Château Cantemerle

    Second of two bought at retail. This was open for business from PnP, with well-concentrated, aging black cherry and cassis on the palate, along with some very elegant—and very Cantemerle-like—undergrowth, black truffle, and pipe tobacco on the nose. Great complexity and nuance here, as well as a long, lingering finish.

    This was showing about an 80/20 primary-to-tertiary profile and had plenty of unresolved, ripe tannins left and miles to go before it slept. In terms of development, it was way ahead of bottles from my lot of the 2010 and much more satisfying right now. I need a case of this stuff. Even now, in its fifteenth year, it’s only about $55 US per bottle by the case. You’ve got to love the value Cantemerle brings to the table. I’ve not yet discovered its equal in this department. 13% ABV (great; distinctive/****/17/95)

    2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)

  • 2020 Château Fontenil

    From a single bottle purchased at retail. Coravin pour. Glass-coating concentration. Wow. That’s good wine. I bought this on sale for $23 US, but don’t let the price point fool you.

    This is a bit shy on the nose right now, showing peonies and a bit of leather in addition to plums and cherries on the nose, but in the mouth, it’s a big, weighty, glycerol-drooling beast packed with well-concentrated black and red fruits and showing hints of licorice and dark chocolate covered cherries. It seems very soft at first and then it explodes, courtesy of an electrifying backbone of acidity that brings the juice alive with a zap without giving the least impression of too much acidity. Lots of ripe tannins here. Balance is excellent. Zero perception of the high ABV.

    Young as this is, it is already a great wine that is drinking very well in a flashy, youthful way. There is a lot of juice and structure here. If this develops some complexity and nuance as its youthful in-your-face wow factor fades, it could easily become the 95-point wine some critics have called it. I have bought a case since this tasting. I’d buy two, but I just don’t have the cellar space. The Wine Searcher average price is $28 US. That would provide an excellent QPR for this, but at the sale price of $23 US, this is in back-the-truck-up QPR land. If you’ve got the space, you would do well to load up on this. 14.5% ABV (very good; distinctive/****/16.5/93)

    3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)

  • 2019 Château Sénéjac

    First of a case bought at retail. Drinking very well for such a young wine, showing a well-concentrated but friendly mixture of red and black fruits and dusty tannins on the palate. Not so simple as you might expect on the nose, though, where it also showed peonies, baker’s chocolate, and a hint of cinnamon.

    An astounding value, really. At the full US retail price of $20 a bottle, this represents exceptional QPR, but on sale as it is for $17 at my local retailer, it’s an absolute steal. 13.5% ABV (very good/***/15.5/90)

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 387 Tasting Notes

Message Board Post Public Message

  • Wine_Hoarder says:

    10/31/2023 12:44:00 PM - How was the d'Issan 2016? I'm hoping you're not angry with me for goading you into cracking one. Cheers! RG

  • bestdamncab says:

    2/6/2022 11:18:00 AM - Most Chateaus hold back stocks without labels as it avoids mold and mildew, and place new labels when ordered ex-Chateau.

  • bestdamncab says:

    2/6/2022 11:16:00 AM - The 1943 Chateau Rouget is #3 of 83 shows my picture.

  • paulst says:

    11/28/2021 11:28:00 AM - Jake- You asked if the 82 Beychevelle is worth the price. I think the 75 is a much better wine today. The 82 does not measure up to most of the 82s I've had. paulst

  • macaujames says:

    8/21/2021 11:59:00 AM - Hi Jake from what I remember from my tasting note of the 2012 Potensac this is a very good wine but one to keep 3-5 years and revisit. It lacks alcohol and body compared to the 2015 and 2016. I have a couple of bottles of Poujeaux 1997 which are better than my 1995 Poujeaux. Compared to a vintage like the 2005, 2009, 2010, 2015 this will be more austere but sill very good in its way. Sometimes the petit millesime can still keep but it depends on what you are looking for and will probably show the terroir more than a Grand miilesime. But if the bottles are fading, then drink up!

×
×