Community Tasting Note

• UTPK wrote:

  May 28, 2012 - Had the 2002 and 2000 after eachother. The difference was smaller than expected. The 2002 had a lovely nose of green herbs, some cedar but less so than in a Pauillac. Also some red berries. Good body with mature fruit, albeit some greenness and more acid than the 2000. The 2000 had another notch to offer both on the nose and on the palate. More dark berries, less green herbs and another layer of fruit. Deeper fruit on the palate. But as I said the difference is smaller than the vintages would suggest.

  13,256 views

Add a Comment