5/5/24, 10:31 AM - Cheers John!
4/15/24, 7:09 AM - It’s one of the photos of this wine bottle / label on this wine’s main page.
4/3/24, 11:01 AM - Interestingly the 2016 and 2015 are high scoring with many reviews on Cellar Tracker, and both available here, if you really wanted to get your hands on some. https://www.wizers.com/page/page/4039539.htm
3/22/24, 8:25 AM - Miss tasting with you Soyhead!
1/5/24, 4:29 PM - Good note. Super helpful. I will pull my last one tonight and report back.
11/28/23, 9:16 AM - Slulkin, seems like you try one of these each vintage. Do you recall a favorite? Or are they pretty consistent? Does the site have some signature elements?
10/5/23, 2:22 PM - Sounds so good! I love this winery too.
9/21/23, 2:07 PM - :))
9/19/23, 6:24 PM - Did you aerate, Drrobvino, and for how long?
9/19/23, 4:45 PM - As one prone to decant almost every red myself, I suggest--based on my experience with this wine--that a little *less* air may be better for the 02 Lambrays at this point. Maybe 30 min in the decanter then gently complete its opening over the next hour or so in the glass.
6/10/23, 6:37 PM - I am loving the 2010 Brunellos right now and have a couple set aside for your visit!
6/6/23, 7:18 AM - exactly.
1/18/23, 11:50 PM - What’s your ideal food pairing for this?
1/19/23, 11:58 AM - Thank you!
1/5/23, 4:55 PM - Yes, exactly how I feel about Occidental: pedigreed and nothing else like it. Well said P.A.
1/5/23, 4:48 PM - Thank you P.A.! I have not visited but would love to. Maybe this summer ...
1/5/23, 11:28 AM - Haldolugr -- looks like you have a duplicate of this note ...
11/16/22, 10:07 PM - Thanks for this. I have been sitting on a couple of these. How much air did you give it?
11/16/19, 3:48 PM - Yeah, I can see that perspective. Great balance and stuffing though. And a friendly presence under all that good structure.
8/26/22, 10:19 AM - Yes!
8/26/22, 10:18 AM - Sounds delicious. We're pushing gently over here to drink our Brunellos younger. After we found some '04s and '06s to be too savory and balsamic for our palates, we decided to move through our '10s sooner than planned and are finding them to be perfect right now. I'm learning that--depending on the bottling--Sangiovese at 6-14 years is about right for me. Hoping to serve the remaining '10s in coming quarters on my way through a few '13s and '15s, positioning to start asap on the should-be-glorious '16s.
7/30/22, 10:47 AM - JVPhoto -- curious how much air you gave this. I find the those horse saddle sweat components take a few hours to come into equilibrium.
2/28/22, 5:38 PM - You know me. tiny sips.
2/6/22, 1:19 PM - Same last night (2/5/22). Three hours into decanting, still sharp and surprisingly short. This may need to start aerating before lunch to be ready in time for dinner.
1/20/22, 6:58 PM - Agreed! thanks so much for the comment. Hope you're enjoying something great this coming weekend.
1/6/22, 12:44 PM - Big smile
11/26/21, 3:46 PM - My pleasure srh!
8/6/21, 5:53 PM - Yes it did! Thanks.
6/16/21, 10:42 PM - One of my favorite ever wines. I’ve got one double mag still!
7/29/21, 6:29 PM - AlphaMike did you aerate that mag and for how long? Considering opening my last of many of these -- a double mag -- for a birthday dinner this weekend.
7/11/21, 4:10 PM - Me too. A gem!
6/27/21, 3:57 PM - Thank you for this comment Dave! Adjusted my note to highlight it for others' benefit.
4/18/21, 12:18 AM - Slulkin, my buddy won a double mag of this in a charity poker match! Even in the large format I’d think drink now, yeah?
4/6/21, 7:18 PM - Chomsky, love this note. Grateful for the experience. I've got two of the '16 I was going to hold for a few more years -- we can enjoy one together when you're in San Francisco. Not sure if you caught any of my other notes recently but I've ceased to use scores for the most part.
4/12/21, 11:16 AM - Absolutely!
4/6/21, 7:25 PM - Losing a little fruit over time? Would be a little disappointing for this blend so soon?
3/31/21, 10:15 PM - +1 jrick on Eric Guido!
3/31/21, 11:53 AM - Thank you Vide. Your evolving experients resonates with my own as a taster.
3/27/21, 10:36 AM - Beautiful label too. How accurate was the shelf talker?
3/27/21, 4:54 PM - Have you spent time with her? Could be phenomenal source for hearing your preferences and directing you to some new stuff.
3/22/21, 9:30 PM - How's the 2020 compare to previous vintages? Sounds consistent ...
3/22/21, 8:54 PM - Enjoyed this again last night and tonight on your recommendation slulkin. Night two this time noticed dark smokey element swirling below the surface. Love the energy!
2/10/21, 11:49 PM - IJC I’ve been souring on the 100pt scale and considering alternatives. Thanks for the great ideas here. You call out four of your criteria (profoundness, pleasure to you, memorability, degree of meeting expectations). Question: if a wine is high quality but not to your taste, how do you rate it?
2/11/21, 9:31 AM - Bob, note that CT has the option in "display settings" to "Hide scores without notes" but not the reverse. You could request the feature ;) Look, almost all my notes have scores on the 100pt scale. But my sense is arising that those scores--while certainly having some value--no longer really get at (and might even obscure) the more important truths about a special wine. Confession: I am also starting to feel that way about using direct descriptors, it smells like this other thing and tastes like that other thing. Don't get me wrong, it was all valuable to me for many years to understand what was happening with wine; and both 100-scale scores and direct descriptors are standard and thus valuable to readers too. But especially for the most moving wines it all seems so inadequate and even absurd.
2/12/21, 4:11 PM - Also, IJC, still very interested in your thoughts on this question: if a wine is objectively high quality but not to your taste, how do you rate it? Or do you not think in terms of objective quality for wine (either because you feel there's no such thing or because it's not a factor in your reviews)?
2/13/21, 8:50 AM - Seijaro, totally agree on how to use critics. And part of what I’m saying here is that I’ve been writing my reviews as a critic this whole time. And I’m just starting to think about eliminating or at least relaxing that angle.
2/19/21, 5:16 AM - Check this outhttps://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0527/6177/files/how_we_rate_wines.pdf?
2/15/21, 2:02 PM - That is really mind blowing. And it always surprises me how a sip of wine can bring such visions.Seth I've noticed you use a 20pt scale. I'm flirting with the idea of abandoning scores, in part or altogether. I'm also thinking of moving away from specific descriptors, especially where a wine is so moving.
2/14/21, 1:50 PM - Not super experienced with riesling; considering opening a 375 tonight with fresh crab. Your thoughts on that, on temperature for serving, and on how much aeration to give it? Thanks!
2/12/21, 2:35 PM - Eric, for the 2016 of this bottling you said "Place this in the cellar for ten years or more; but don’t make the mistake of not checking in from time to time, because I expect the 2016 to enjoy a long and open drinking window" I have a good feel for when something is/ isn't yet ready. But how do you determine whether a wine will shut down / enter a "dumb phase."? Would love your thoughts .
2/12/21, 4:08 PM - re: "has the structure to age, but the richness and ripeness of fruit to still give pleasure while it does so." I always assumed that if a wine has great structure *without* the fruit to match, not only will it not give pleasure while aging but it will unlikely ever give more pleasure than now. And similarly that as structure of a wine eases, if the fruit is fading even faster, it's not likely to be better in the future. Where, from your perspective, is that off the mark? Appreciate this and you Eric!
1/31/21, 8:10 AM - The ‘14 is ready to go now; enjoyed over a few hours without decanting. Such a treat! I say pop one.
1/31/21, 9:36 AM - Awesome, no kidding! Chomsky I see you don’t have scores on your notes. This is something I’ve been thinking about. Can you share your thoughts on that approach?
1/31/21, 1:22 PM - Fascinating. I think I'm due for a change in the rankings approach. Detroit native, Bay Area since since just before law school in '95!
2/3/21, 6:43 PM - Thanks very much MrOctoberfest!We are fortunate to have been able to experience Sozet's craft. Can't wait to hear what you two think of this '14.
1/28/21, 10:36 PM - Great note! I’d been wondering if you ended up opening it!
1/24/21, 10:56 PM - Couldn’t agree more Latache01. Purchased 6 on faith because I normally love this bottling but the 17s are shrill.
1/17/21, 10:15 PM - Loved the ‘13 so much! Too bad we couldn’t be together for a side-by-side :)
12/30/20, 5:41 PM - Check this out: Vintage Berkeley/ Solano Cellars basically copied your review for their mailer!"Based on the warm 2015 vintage, the 743 displays the roundness of the vintage with aplomb. The nose stuns; fresh and pure like a smell of an alpine breeze on a perfect winter's day. Ripe apple, pear, buttered brioche, toasted almonds, and a chalky, zippy, invigorating minerality. There is plenty of acid for lift (this is a zero-dosage wine), and the finish goes on forever."
12/25/20, 10:21 PM - Well the second one was merely less corked than the first! Bottles a year ago were wonderful. And good news I’ve got a few more.
11/17/20, 9:59 AM - Corrected the typo; they're 12s. Thank you Chip.
11/3/20, 7:59 AM - Agreed--a fan of this producer. Cuvée Beauvais bottling great too. Socially distanced glass tonight Chris, before election results start rolling in?
10/24/20, 1:07 PM - Vous dissez, "Bien, mais n’en vaut pas son prix." Est-ce que le "81 points" sans consideration du prix? merci!
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search