Important Update From the Founder Read message >

Tasting Notes for mathwonk

(371 notes on 358 wines)

1 - 50 of 371 Sort order
Red
4/17/2024 - mathwonk wrote:
tasty but hard to drink at first because of sharpness. became quite delicious after several days, maybe a week, open and recorked.
Red
2019 Dominus Estate Napa Valley Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
3/14/2024 - mathwonk wrote:
very satisfying. rich and powerful, good from the get go, and got progressively better. I was worried for a while as the bitter aspects threatened to outweigh the fruity ones, but after several hours, it smoothed out and became quite delightful, having started out strong and alcoholic.
so don't drink it all before it reaches its best, as that is a temptation and risk.

of course, if you have not had these, I do not recommend it as really "worth" the $300+ that it costs [but see edit below], but knowing that, if you are willing to spring for that price anyway, I think you will be satisfied, which I myself was definitely not with the 2009.

A friend recommended instead a Bevan or Blankiet, but I have not tried those, which cost a bit less. After drinking this, and reading reviews here, I suspect I may not agree, but must suspend judgment until I have those.

edit: one night later; after last night's Dominus, an attempt to scale back is a failure. Tonight's Lopez Heredia 2008, is barely drinkable, light and lacking in depth or interest. It begins as tasty but quickly becomes tiresomely sweet. By contrast, the entire bottle of Dominus went down easily.

cheers.
Red
2/23/2024 - mathwonk wrote:
disappointing, especially at over $60. maybe my bottle was heat damaged? I only say this after reading praise for it here, which I cannot understand based on my one experience.

day two; it is actually delicious in flavor, but I still do not like it. It is a bit sharp, and thin, and the flavors are not the deep, dark, smooth ones I prefer.

Trying it again, although the drinking experience is not pleasant, the flavor is, one is tempted to add it to a beef stew;,.. but it might be too sweet.

for comparison, I enjoy the Stags' leap cab: the Leap, 2019. of course it is $95. I also like Chateau Gloria 2015 at a similar price, and some 2010 Rioja grand riservas for less.
cheers!
Red
2/15/2024 - mathwonk wrote:
wow. filled the bill perfectly for a good Valentine's wine, with steak. good out of the bottle and kept softening and improving for the hour or more we took to drink it. we poured it into a decanter, which I recommend. not only for the beneficial air, but so you can see how much is left. the punt is so big, and the bottle so heavy, you might be disappointed if you turn up the bottle near the end to find nothing left. it is expensive, nearly $100, but I was certainly not disappointed, and immediately made a mental note to buy more. not subtle or thoughtful, but intense and rich.

I just realized this is stags' leap wine and not stag's leap wine. I never had a stags' leap wine I liked before, and was always a stag's leap drinker. glad to learn both wineries have something fine to offer.
Red
2009 Dominus Estate Napa Valley Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
1/17/2024 - mathwonk wrote:
Extremely disappointing. I criticized the 2014 and 2015 for being simply concentrated and rich but uninteresting. This one did not even have that going for it. Those were fantastic compared to this. Took a very long time to open up and even then was not very open or full. I do not recommend this to anyone. Unfortunately I also bought it at a restaurant hence overpaid enormously, which is a big factor in my disappointment. (We took it home and aired it for hours.) But still this is the worst Dominus I ever had, the only one that did not impress at all. Of course conceivably it may be temporarily closed, and become excellent in 5 more years, but I would not gamble on that.
Red
2017 Dominus Estate Napa Valley Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
8/26/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
special anniversary treat. so good we just drank it and forgot to make notes or even write a review. "yummy."
Red
2015 Château Gloria St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
8/24/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
a beautiful bottle of wine. I think I passed it through an aerator after it initially seemed less open.
Red
8/6/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
I bought this as a birthday present for a friend who likes strong Spanish wine. this satisfied him and all of us. we opened it and began to taste immediately and drank over the next hour or so. that was ample air. as often happens, even though it was a bit of sour cherries at first, it is still more enjoyable to taste and drink as it airs, than it is to just wait and be disappointed at missing the perfect moment. it was worth the $60 or so I paid. recommended, at least in the current inflated market for wine.
4 people found this helpful Comment
Red
7/4/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
I think this is very good, smooth and delicious, if uncomplicated. at about $33, it definitely is the best QPR of any AW wine I know of. We are enjoying also the Champoux vineyard 2014, but that is over $70, and higher alcohol level.
Red
6/17/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
On opening, quite tart, and tasty. Reminds of a fresh rhubarb pie my wife is making again for father's day. we both like it.

the next day, still delicious, still quite tart, hard to drink much of for that reason. Actually enjoying more much cheaper wines, a $22 meleto chianti, and a $50 duckhorn merlot. The barolo is more enjoyable by virtue of our love of all things Italy than its actual taste.
1 person found this helpful Comments (1)
Red
2018 Castello di Meleto Chianti Classico Riserva Borgaio Chianti Classico DOCG Sangiovese Blend, Sangiovese (view label images)
6/14/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
yes, this is simple uncomplicated wine. but it only costs $22, and is quite enjoyable, and did not give me a headache, as does most cheap wine. i do not know of any other comparably drinkable and harmless red wine at this price, and under 14% alcohol, like this. sure i would rather have a duckhorn merlot, but that is $50, and higher alcohol. By the way it also improved the second day, but seldom goes to the second day.
Red
5/18/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
excellent. hard to think of a better 20 dollar red wine. of course i may have a headache tomorrow, as with all cheap red wines. but for the moment i can drink more than one glass.

for comparison, my local store recommended a similar priced bordeaux, feret-lambert, 2018, and I liked the taster, but I could not drink even a whole glass.
Red
2018 Château Langoa Barton St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
5/3/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
just delicious. the clear favorite over the similarly priced altesino brunello. much more depth and richness. a good buy at $68....

well, tonight 6 months later, we preferred an $18 meleto Borgaio riserva chianti over this $70 wine.
1 person found this helpful Comment
White
5/3/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
delicious on a hot spring day. mild alcohol, tasty and no headache. tried it since my go - to chablis, pascal bouchard le classique, was out of stock.
Red
4/17/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
tasty, but fairly plain and hugely overpriced at over $100. i.e. if it were $40-$50 it would be fine, but I will certainly not buy more. a more modest offering, maybe cumberland reserve, from the same winery at a lower price was fine, about the same taste or better, at less than half the price, so I thought I would try the more prized vineyard, unfortunately for my gullibility.
Red
3/23/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
pnp. wow. i hope this improves after some more time. at present, maybe 30 minutes after opening, it is essentially undrinkably sour tea, in my obviously ignorant view. lots of bitter tobacco like flavors but no grape or fruit flavors, and no sweetness. i will try the 2015 next time, which i recall very differently. maybe this will improve in 5 years, but i will not be there waiting.

by contrast, the 2018 yesterday was also obviously too young and tannic, but still enjoyable. this is not. will repost if it changes for the better over the next few hours or maybe days.

4-5 hours later: no improvement. so far a waste of $60, except for the education.

second night: improved to the point of being drinkable, and smelling good from a swirled carafe, but not really enjoyable tasting. It is not like bad or cheap wine, and not corked, just less than pleasant tasting high quality wine. as a comparison, i like high quality chocolate (gianduotti), but neither cheap chocolate, nor high quality licorice.

third night: improved to the point of being reasonably enjoyable and we essentially finished it, even if occasionally mixing it a little with an older rioja. so as others more knowledgable here have emphasized, this is quality wine that demands a lot of airtime and/or more age.
2 people found this helpful Comments (2)
Rosé - Sparkling
2/17/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
beautiful looking bottle, fun experience sharing with other members the experience of a highly rated universally liked bubbly. but in fact, although we quite liked it, and drank it all with no difficulty, for the price, locally $100, and $85 on wine searcher, i would say it is quite overpriced. for my taste this was slightly less enjoyable than a $65 veuve cliquot nv rose. over the last few days we have tried 4 nv rose's: mailly $65, montaudon $43, laurent perriier $100, and veuve cliquot $65. Of these, we will probably not try the first two again, and the last two were very similar with the veuve preferable in taste and enjoyment. For the price difference that makes the choice easy. if money is not a consideration, this is quite nice and would probably be better with more age. the disgorgement seems to have been in 3rd quarter of 2018. (C81 FO)

of course part of the fun of the exercise was having something different every day and the chance to compare and discuss. so that is worth something. cheers!
Rosé - Sparkling
2/17/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
we mostly enjoyed it, but it had a weird taste, making it hard to enjoy without food. It was a little hard to finish off the bottle for the two of us, which is a bad sign here. At the price point of $65 I would certainly not buy again, but in fact would not buy even if cheaper, unless it were 10 or 20 dollars. At the $65 price one can have an excellent, very enjoyable, veuve cliquot! thus overall pretty disappointing.
2 people found this helpful Comment
Rosé - Sparkling
2/14/2023 - mathwonk wrote:
We chose this today for valentines's day and were very happy with it. I enjoyed it more than the 2012 vintage we had in august, and especially so at $45 less. This was also more enjoyable than the regular veuve cliquot NV yesterday, and worth the $15 more. I should say I like wines and champagne with some sweetness to them, more than ones excessively acidic.
I also enjoy champagne with some mellowness and yeasty notes, which this did not have, but those seem present more in bottles friends have kindly aged for me in their cellars.
Red
2010 Château Léoville Barton St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
11/23/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
on opening, a strong and fragrant aroma, but on tasting, very tannic, almost undrinkable. so we decanted and tasted regularly. After almost 6 hours in decanter, it became delicious, especially if a tiny bit of frogs leap cab 2018 was added to mellow it. I conclude this can be drunk now, with effort and patience, but would greatly benefit from some years (more than one) in the cellar. The price is also high for the experience, at $140. E.g. a Chateau Talbot 2015, also over priced at about $100, is much more enjoyable for drinking now, pnp, and significantly cheaper. in fact a 2016 cantemerle is comparably rich, ready on opening, and about 1/3 the price. the barton was a good deal more enjoyable the third day, but of course the only reason it lasted till then was it was hardly drinkable the first two. in fact i still find it a little tannic. so it seems to have a bright future, but hard to enjoy now. final comment: after 3 days, the last few swallows of the barton still sit in the bottle, with no one clamoring for it, while the cantemerle 2016 and even the les ormes de pez 2017 disappeared quickly.
4 people found this helpful Comments (10)
Red
2014 Andrew Will Champoux Vineyard Horse Heaven Hills Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
10/25/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
First bottle of this wine I have had in 2 years. In 2020 the one I drank with friends needed a bit of time in the decanter, whereas this one was ready to drink right out of the bottle. I had thought to save some for a second night, but it was so enjoyable, that did not happen. As to grapes, a previous reviewer gave the composition it seems rather of the ciel du cheval (all merlot and cab franc). This label (champoux vineyard 2014) says 43% merlot, 33% cab sav, 22 % cab franc, and 2% malbec. This is the reason I chose it over the ciel du cheval, as I prefer cab sav to cab franc. These wines are very hard to find here in washington state. I especially prize it in this vintage since the alcohol levels have gone up recently (from 14.5% to above 15%), probably a factor of climate change, but the winemaker reins have apparently also passed from father to son.
Red
10/14/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
mild, very pleasant. good qpr.
Red
2018 Château Phélan Ségur St. Estèphe Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
I thought this was quite good, and I normally dislike st. estephe wines. I preferred however both the 2017 gaja dragomis and the 2013 pied du mont chauve chassagne montrachet 1er cru les chaume'e, which were also brought to the same event and comparably priced. Of course they were obviously both somewhat older, which can help. PnP.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
a very enjoyable b'day gift. delicious and it disappeared fast at the party. PnP. At the $90 it costs locally, I might even buy myself another one.

oops, it its now $140 one year later. and the 2018 langoa barton is still $70.
White - Sparkling
9/18/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
I am not a champagne connoisseur, and this was a birthday party gift, so price matters less, but it was very well enjoyed by everyone including me. I know it cost $100 however, and to me that is still a better buy than my more frequent $50 veuve cliquot NV.
Red
2016 Château Poujeaux Moulis en Médoc Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
9/10/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
tasty with LOTS of air. it was too sharp to enjoy upon opening and since I did not want to wait 4 hours, I sloshed it back and forth between two decanters 8 or 10 times and then aerated it into my glass, and we are enjoying it. and at $35 the price is definitely right. with some more age this would probably be pretty good.
2 people found this helpful Comment
Red
9/10/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
Delicious and interesting. Not the deep thoughtful cab sav flavor i recall from the previous decade versions, but more like a cherry or plum pie, and very youthful. Taking BROUIGU1's advice, we poured it right away and tasted it slowly, enjoying every evolving nuance. Drinking this was fun, although I actually became a little tired of the somewhat bright flavor, after a glass or two, preferring the darker taste of the 2001 latour we had last week. I mean $250 is a rather expensive cherry pie, and there is no pie I know that tastes like latour grapes. But we finished this bottle quite enjoyably, and I will say I might buy another one of these at $250, even if it is only worth about half that, but I will not buy another $800 latour 2001. If I should come across the latour at a more reasonable price like $250, I will not decant it this time. cheers!
2 people found this helpful Comment
Red
8/23/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
I agree with the precise description yesterday by Aagrawal. We poured two small glasses upon opening, and decanted the rest, tasting along as we waited for it to open fully. At first it was mostly alcoholic and a bit thin, even unpleasing. It gradually smoothed out and became richer during an hour or two over dinner and we drank more and thoroughly enjoyed it. It continually became fruitier and smoother, eventually to the point that my wife thought it had lost its character and become "like a california wine". It was so strongly alcoholic (at 15%), although not unenjoyably so, that we could not finish it, needing to drive home, and gave the remainder to the grateful waiter. This is not my favorite style of wine and at $200 I will probably not do this again, but it seemed perfect for a fine special occasion Italian dinner.
2 people found this helpful Comment
Red
8/21/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
this is delicious and rich. we opened and decanted it 3 hours ago and it was so good it was hard to wait for it to evolve, but we did so, tasting only twice in between. now round, full, rich and delicious. But I keep comparing latours to my first one, a 1970 drunk in 1981, and so far none have come close to that in depth and intellectual interest. so this is wonderful wine, and on a special occasion, possibly worth it, but straight up, only if you have unlimited funds.

edit: perhaps I decanted it a bit long, as it actually had more power and interest when first opened, although a bit tart. I would suggest pouring a full glass at the beginning and drinking that slowly over an hour or so while the wine decants, to experience its evolution more fully.

2nd edit: After reading notes from people underwhelmed by this wine, and not wanting to mislead anyone considering buying it, I feel an obligation to say that unless you are (like me) absolutely unable to resist occasionally having a Latour, this wine although lovely, cannot be said to be at all worth the current $800 price. I would say, in terms of quality, it should be priced at most $200-$250, but since it is one of the most sought after labels on earth...
1 person found this helpful Comment
Rosé - Sparkling
8/21/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
this was delicious and we drank it all at one sitting, unlike most champagnes. still, the high acidity was to me a drawback, as mentioned by someone earlier. It tasted sort of like peach coolade infused with sparkling water and alcohol, no mushroom or yeasty notes at all. I am certainly not a champagne expert, but I would suggest based on my favorite examples from more expert friends, that it could benefit from mellowing for a few more years, maybe 5 or more. but we enjoyed it, even though to me it was very overpriced at $100. the nv, at $50 locally, is actually mellower and somewhat easier drinking, if less interesting. but it was a special occasion, was well enjoyed, and i am not sorry i bought it. but at this QPR i will not rush to buy it again.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
8/4/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
I agree with chimer on description. But to me although a lovely delicious wine, still a bit hot and young, with alcoholic notes that rose fairly soon to my head. I decated and aerated it and even added a splash of 2018 frogs leap cab to smooth it out a bit and add a slight amount of depth. My wife and I both agreed it improved it. But someone who knows they like this specific flavor profile would not of course do this.
Red
6/18/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
recommended by our host in lucca. everyone liked it. smooth and easy drinking. moderate alcohol. we bought a case and only went through about 8 due to dining out many times and an abundance of other good wine at home. in a week in lucca, literally every wine we were given was good, and mostly unheard of to me. this was about $20 at enoteca Bonini in Carignano, as were most wines we had, even in restaurants. now back home struggling to find anything as enjoyable at twice the price.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
6/17/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
sharp and hard to drink. overly alcoholic and thin. good flavor. so we will probably use this mainly to cook with, where its negative aspects will be minimized. thanks to bonedoc note, may try again tomorrow.

it worked well on the mushrooms my wife was cooking, and we also drank most of it after adding some 12 year old rioja gran reserve.
White
5/15/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
13% ABV. a fun experiment in advance of a trip to tuscany. my wife liked it better than I, but I thought it was tasty. It just had the overly heavy aromatic style that limits me to at most one glass, not wanting more. In this less expensive range, I prefer simple, light, white wines like Anne de K pinot blanc. But as always, it is more fun and interesting to try different wines, even if you don't love them all, rather than the same old, same old.
Red
5/14/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
absolutely delicious. a bit strong and alcoholic, but quite ready to drink now. i am looking forward to the second day, since some is still left, because of how strong it was. good stuff. much better than the $10 cheaper paneretta torre a destra at total wine.
Red
5/13/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
Unfortunately my bottle was slightly corked, which affected the aftertaste, and all breaths inhaled after a drink of it. But the taste itself was still delicious and rich. If your bottle is not corked, I think it will be quite good, not complex or thoughtful, but rich and delicious.

edit
; 7-12-2022: an excellent bottle, much better the second day.
Red
2018 Columbia Crest Grand Estates Gold Columbia Valley Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
4/24/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
I wish they would make a $20 wine that was proportionately better than this $8 wine. cheap but drinkable tooth staining red blend, the kind you pay $12 a glass for in (some) pike place market restaurants, or better.
Red
4/18/2022 - mathwonk wrote:
A very rare example of a red wine under $20 I have enjoyed [see edit below]. Delicious rich flavor, but still a bit of coarseness typical of this price point. The more air the better. I am on my 3rd bottle and enjoying saving money, but probably won't buy more.

Somewhat deceptively, the excellent winery seems to be in Burgundy, and most wine websites describe this as a Burgundy, but the winery's own website says their pinot noir comes from the "south of France". So these grapes may be sourced from Languedoc, where pinot noir seems relatively cheap.

later: after 3 bottles, I have only enjoyed the first one, and perhaps because that one was following its even cheaper non reserve sibling. I have another, which I will suggest my wife add to the stew.
Red
12/28/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
lovely wine. We asked a locally based Italian immigrant wine seller for a recommendation for goose dinner and this was it. sadly all that is left tonight are my own picks, as this is all gone, and he is snowed in - closed, for a few days, as are we. I wish I had more.
Red
2015 Dominus Estate Napa Valley Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
8/21/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
This is excellent wine. But wines cost money, and it is necessary to relate their cost to the experience. In this case, for $300, I would suggest that 4 $75 bottles of Andrew Will Sorella 2015, is a much better investment than one bottle of this wine. This wine is denser and less berry tasting, so deeper, and more syrupy. But this is more like whisky or liqueur than wine, at least to me, and my wife and I had a bit of difficulty finishing it, whereas a bottle of Sorella would have definitely disappeared. So my suggestion is that if you only want to taste it, you go in with 3 other people and each have one glass of this wine, whereas if you want to drink the whole bottle yourself at dinner, go for the Sorella, or maybe a Chateau Talbot. If you really want a Dominus, I suggest the 2014 at $230, is essentially the same wine as this more expensive wine, probably just because someone gave this one 100 points. At least my memory from a few years ago of the 2014 was basicallly the same as this. long story short: dense, concentrated, excellent, but over extracted, over priced wine.

Note that some people are reacting only to a tasting they had at an event, where they may have been given it for free. In that setting , of course do it! But if you are buying it, I offer my advice.

At a similar price point, I prefer the Leoville las Cases 2003.

remark: Because of the notes here, I decanted it 3 hours, but felt that although it smoothed out, it lost a bit of intensity, so of course as you no doubt always do, taste as you decant.
2 people found this helpful Comments (5)
Red
2015 Andrew Will Champoux Vineyard Horse Heaven Hills Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
8/19/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
apparently quite at odds with others here, i say lovely to drink right now, with no airtime at all. delightful, light, spritely, fruity, zingy. will get more tomorrow.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
I agree with the note from 8-2-2021 by hanibal, i.e. acidic with little fruit. Also, at $70, it costs $30 more than a noticeably richer and gentler bottle of panaretta torre a destra chianti. so hopefully i will not buy again. In fact I recall having been disapointed by this wine before. Probably someone knowledgable told me that it was a good label. Maybe for some, but apparently not my style. I prefer Barbi and Casanova di Neri. I have now read at least 5 glowing professional reviews of it, by Parker, Suckling, etc,..., but the deep rich wine they describe has little or no resemblance to what I tasted. And my wife agreed with me. Also significantly overpriced at Total Wine compared to widely advertised examples at $50.

Ok now it is a day later, and it is still astringent and alcoholic in the extreme. Admittedly now there is a delicious taste hidden under all that, but hardly drinkable anyway. I have a headache a minute or two after one sip.

3 days later it is a little milder but still not remotely enjoyable.

same thing on the 5th day. the problem is the hot alcohol. this would probably go well to flavor a stew.
2 people found this helpful Comments (1)
Red
7/19/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
we are enjoying this tonight. we finished off the higher end andrew will sorella 2015, and followed it with this wine costing $45 less, with little dropoff in enjoyment. I still prefer the sorella, but have a budget, so this is a welcome find. i did mellow it a bit with addition of a 10 year old rioja, since I prefer gentler wines.
Red
2006 Andrew Will Champoux Vineyard Horse Heaven Hills Red Bordeaux Blend (view label images)
7/5/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
We enjoyed this wine brought by generous friends to a b'day celebration a few days ago. It turns out I had given it them 13 years ago also as a b'day gift, but the recipient, unknown to me at the time, prefers white wine, so it was cellared for a suitable occasion.

This was popped and poured and seemed quite young to me, strong and flavorful, with noticeable cab sav content, apparently 57% according to other notes here, compared to 8% merlot. The blend for this label has evolved considerably over the years, and the 2015 version now has about 51% merlot and only 12% cab sav.

Since to me wine is usually enjoyable roughly in proportion to the amount of cab sav, this was a treat I cannot easily replicate now. However we brought a 2015 Sorella to the same event this weekend (85% cab sav) and to me the two wines were quite comparable, in spite of the significant difference in percent of each varietal and in age. Both wines would probably have benefited from some air time but we enjoyed them and no one wanted to wait.
1 person found this helpful Comment
Red
6/19/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
I thought this was just delicious. Of course at $68 it should be. Still it was fun on a trip to oregon to run across this previously unheard - of winery and enjoy it. Apparently everyone and her brother makes good pinot noir in oregon. We sat on their porch in manzanita, at a small site offering also snacks. The room at the back of the store is labeled "the winery", and indeed there were a few barrels sitting in there. Low key, very good. Of course unavailable in my home city and probably yours. I recall now that real, local wines are only available where they are made, and the rest of us rely on commercially produced wines, produced in quantity and shipped. Actually the Brick House pinot noir we had from newberg, was almost as good, is cheaper, and is available in the total wine store in denver colorado, if you live there.
Red
6/7/2021 - mathwonk wrote:
i liked it, and so did my wife. i drink these "bright" tasting wines in measured doses, so it lasted two days, but it is good quality. $70 at total wine, but i used a 20% off coupon, which makes it somewhat reasonable. i thought it pared well with the scallops we had tonight. i will likely buy again (with another coupon).
1 - 50 of 371
More results
  • Tasting Notes: 371 notes on 358 wines
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close