WS NYC
Tasted Saturday, June 11, 2022 by shifter with 332 views
Very Krug in the best way. Open and inviting with some brioche and yeastiness.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Has everything you want in a well-aged champers. Precision and depth with a fresh and bright finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Lots of VA on the nose. Light mid-palate and feels a bit thin, lacking some depth of fruit to balance out the volatility.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Open for business in that fully mature plateau phase. Great fruit and acid that continued to develop over the course of the evening.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A step up from the '95, however not as open for business. I think the '96 needs more time to continue to develop, however, with a couple of hours of air, this did start to open and show a great depth and purity of fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Darker fruit and less vibrant than some of the other cuvées, this was a bit of an outlier. Mature, but lacking some interest and more integrated tannins.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very good with more red fruit and a mature depth.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Brighter than the '91, but similarly interesting.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very tertiary. Lacking depth and interest.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Corked.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Amazing density and depth of flavor. This needed some air, but started roaring into business fairly quickly. Much more open than some other '96s I've had recently.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
No favors being paired with the '96 Beze, this showed a bit light and simple.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
So, very tight. I just don't know if '99s will ever come around or if maybe they will be just coming into stride for the next centennial celebration.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Beautiful color, the nose really jumps out of the glass. Light strawberry notes. Lovely.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Bursting from the glass with layer upon layer of bright fruit aromas. Palate was deep and finish was extremely long and lingering. #2 WOTN.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Needed air to show true potential, but then it rounded into form with a density and texture that outclassed the '76. Still on the upswing, this wine could be the most amazing bottle I've ever had in another 10 years. WOTN.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Still felt young and limited compared to the others. Needs more time.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Surprisingly was drinking much more beautifully than the '95. I just love the '01 vintage. Open and ready for business with lovely red fruits.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Perfect bottle. This was singing from go. Such depth and precision with an unexpected youthful exuberance and freshness.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Incredibly young and fresh on the front palate, but with a beguiling mid-palate depth and a long and bright finish. This is a nearly perfect champagne experience.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Late entry. Decanted. This is much more open than the last time I had it a couple of years ago. It's relaxed quite a bit and the acid and fruit have come into much more of a balance. A great drink, just crushable. So glad that I stocked up before prices went through the roof.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very dark, black fruits. Comments about the rustic nature of CdlR abounded around the table, especially on the heels of the amazing Chambertin flight.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
More open than the '87. Had some similarities on the nose to the '88 Chambertin and Beze, moreso than I might have expected. Nice finish.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
More comments about the rustic nature of CdlR. This didn't have the elegance of some of the other cuvees, but an enjoyable power.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
So tight and unyielding, '99s are just closed for business for at least another decade or 3.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Intoxicating nose that I could be satisfied just smelling for days. Beguiling palate, sweet, but bright and balanced, lots of depth and complexity, extremely exotic. Such a satisfying finish that lingered for an eternity.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Such a wonderful comparison to the TBA, this was also sweet, but more ethereal and elegant. This didn't have the same cloying sweetness, but more bright and balanced. Wonderful, but my vote was for the TBA.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.
1996 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon 94 Points
France, Champagne
Still fresh, but very open. Vibrant acid. Great way to open the evening.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue