NYC
Tasted Monday, July 14, 2008 by Gregory Dal Piaz with 631 views
While July in the city is not the ideal venue for a few bottles of older Italian wine I couldn't afford to fly back to Italy quite yet so it would have to do. For no particular reason i joined a small group of ex-co-workers for a look back at the vaulted 1997 Tuscan vintage with a pair of northern intruders thrown in just for fun. As we all know 1997 was heralded as the second coming on release and i was not immune to the hype. in fact I visited Italy in early 2000 and tasted my way through many of the better "Supers" and they were indeed impressive in their youths. For the most part that was the peak for these wines. They have not aged as well as one would have hoped suffering from highish alcohols and wood abuse, coming as they did from about the peak of barrique usage.
The one saving grace for the wines remains the great concentration of the fruit. Most can easily recall that it was a hot vintage but two significant characteristics framed that heat, the late spring frost that reduced yields and the lack of significant snowfall during the preceding winter that caused the vines to seek out deep reserves of water during the drier periods of the year. There was some rainfall now and again and it seemed to come just as needed to prevent the vines from suffering too much hydric stress but limited the natural tendencies of the vines to produce big, plump grapes. The resultant fruit was dark, ripe and concentrated with ripe, balanced tannins and good acids. Many wines of the vintage continue to exhibit these fine qualities while some, particularly wines coming from warmer regions, have taken on pruny, roasted qualities and the heavy handed winemaking style of the period has resulted in some wines emerging as a bit clumsy. It was easy to like these wines in their youths as the incredible fruit levels hid or balanced the excessive use of wood or toast but with time the elegance of Sangiovese, it's bright visceral appeal has been squashed.
While this is frequently touted as a vintage of the century etc, I find that 1997 doesn't even make my top three for the decade, which I would rate as 1999,1990,1995. But just barely as I prefer 1995 stylistically to 1990 but the extra five years of bottle age puts 1990 in the lead for the moment. To each his own i would suggest. I don't buy much "Super" Sangiovese anymore save Percarlo and Le Pergole Torte though I continue to buy Chianti and Rosso di Montalcino.
As I have been drinking through the wines from the great vintages past I have found that the shifts in winemaking, the "revolution" of the late 80's through the present have not produced wines that outclassed the greats of the past. 1985 remains in many ways the true benchmark vintage for Tuscany. Alas I am down to just a handful of bottle but those wines all reveled in their immutable Sangioveseness. 1988 was certainly one of the greatest vintages for Tuscany but even then the shift had begun. Tasting wines from 1999,2001,2004 I do notice a return to a less manipulated style in many places but for me the addition of certain grapes, Cabernet Sauvignon in particular, fundamentally changes these wines and in particular the way they age.
I will have to wait and see how things pan out, these 1997's should be just at the beginning of their drinking windows as i prefer Sangiovese between the ages of 10-20 years for the most part. To me they seem a bit more evolved than that, perhaps they have sacrificed some longevity for earlier appeal, nothing wrong with that. These remain fun wines, delicious wines, and I continue to believe that Sangiovese is the most food friendly grape on the planet, I just wish that producers would try a little less to compete on a world's stage and focus a bit more on what is in their own backyard. For the most part that is happening and not a moment too soon. Too much babbling so onto the show!
Ok so the Gagliole has a dollop of Cabernet in it, so sue sme. it has always shown so well, pure and airy that I felt it was an appropriate match for the Sangioveto. An interesting pair sharing alot of the same character but while the Gagliole came off as elegant and fresh the Sangioveto seemed a bit forced and extracted. It was certainly the bigger wine but lacked the finesse that makes Gagliole so appealing.
I know that this analogy is beaten to death but I find it very appropriate for this style of Sangiovese. It sucked that the Flaccianello was corked since this pairing, with the Fontalloro, is one of the most interesting comparisons of the vintage. I love both of these wines and they stand as testaments to Sangiovese ability to meld with modern winemaking styles and the intelligent use of barrique. While these are impressive, deep wines I still would prefer the Gagliole as an everyday drinker, mostly based on its food pairing ability and easy, fresh style.
Ok so here are the poster girls for tarted up "Super Tuscans". Too much winemaking and too little Tuscanality. I loved these wines on release, I don't know which has changed more, my palate or these wines but I suspect the wines. While both made for good drinking they lacked finesse and were a bit indistinct. I guess typicity would be a difficult word to use here since one could validly ask what typicity a 50/50 Sangiovese/Merlot is expected to show, or for that matter a 75/20/5 Sangiovese/Cabernet/Syrah, but these wines did not have the appeal of the preceding wines and were just a bit dull and anonymous.
Just for contrast I threw in this pair of Northern interlopers. The Granato disappointed and i love Teroldego, the Steinraffler was simply firing on all cylinders giving everything it had this night. The granato suffered from excess wood, teroldego can be an impressive wine but the flavor impact, particularly the unique minerality is too easily obscured. In my experience it is a wine not particularly suited to obvious use of wood. The Lagrein on the other hand melded with the wood exceptionally well and was a big surprise as i recall this wine from it's youth with a big, spashy overlay of toasty oak that seemed so obvious. I'm glad I was intrigued enough to buy a few additional bottles!
Well that was it. The Gagliole remains a favorite of mine, great crisp fruit, elegant, lithe and pure, just what i want in Sangiovese. The Fontalloro was a resounding success in a much more muscular style but with great complexity. It really needs a big, thick steak glistening in EVOO to shine but that can be arranged! The 2 more made-up wines, Siepi and Avvoltore faired less well, unfortunately as i thoroughly enjoyed both of these wines on release. I was disappointed with the Granato but I am not aware of anyone else making the moves I alluded to in my preamble with greater focus than Elisabetta Foradori. I look forward to seeing the progress made in the future with this fine grapes. And finally I can only kick myself for not buying more Steinraffler, a superb bottle of wine that has aged so well, absorbing the oak that was a little off-putting in its youth and integrating into a complete package. I hope I have another bottle! If not there is always more wine...
1997 Badia a Coltibuono Sangioveto di Toscana 88 Points
Italy, Tuscany, Toscana IGT
Quite pale and delicate rubino color. This opened with a very earthy, fumy nose that showed some raw wood, sweet vanillin, meat and roast herbs, in the mouth it showed an elegant side if a touch chunky with a adequate structure that turned a bit aggressive in the mouth with a bitter/sweet character that played off the earthy core of fruit, very dry in the mouth with a short, rusty finish featuring astringent sour cherry pit fruit. With dinner this showed a bit better featuring a limestony, salty note on the nose and offering up a round core of fruit that had those aggressive tannins popping out like the points on a sprocket. This has good weight in the mouth with a slight chewiness to the earth, sweet baked fruit notes but screams out for food. 2008-2016
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
1997 Gagliole Rosso 91 Points
Italy, Tuscany, Colli della Toscana Centrale IGT
With it's darker, richer ruby coloring one would expect this to be much more intense than the Sangioveto, fortunately not. This opened with a lightly oaky note, a touch toasty and nutty with an underlay of fresh mossy greeness and a hint of spicy white pepper. In the mouth this was elegant with excellent balance, still youthfull with solid acidity and a nice bed of tannins which where just a touch drying. Fruity on the atack and through the mouth with notes of roast sour cherry and red currant gaining a bit of depth with hints of oystershell and dried mace before transitioning into a tight, focused finish with some grape pip astringensy, fine length, and a lightly smoky, light raspberry finale. With dinner this gained rusty and talcy notes on the nose over a base of of roasted cherry fruit and top notes of flowers and tobacco. In the mouth this offered up a pure core of fruit with fine acid balance, really lovely and bordering on zesty with a return to almost sweetness, fine interplay. A bit lighter bodied than most but with a fine tobacco and spice finish with a raw, bitter almond finale. This may be faulted for lacking a bit of power or complexity but is really very fine Sangiovese and I could drink this almost everyday. 2008-2014
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue