Ibetian
Posts: 3576
Joined: 7/15/2007 From: Sarasota, FL and the Berkshires Status: offline
|
As others have said the most important thing to me is how it’s drinking now, with supporting info on provenance and handling. I use this to help decide whether to make a trip to the offsite, dig a case out of the stack and crack it open. But I do sometimes use CT to help with purchase decisions for the cellar (though not now, I’m in the Moratorium!) or for drinking at a restaurant when they don’t have corkage. In addition to the drinking window, I appreciate thoughts on the style of the wine. Is it red fruited or black/blue? Noticeable oak or alcohol? Balance overall? Complexity? More fruit bomb or AFWE? I admire those who can detect multiple scents or tastes in a wine, but I’m not one of them; general info on style is better for me than a long list of descriptors. I’m actually pretty flexible on enjoying different styles in different contexts, but I like to know what I’m getting into. Trigger alert! Score discussion ahead! I also value the score and score trends. I recently saw an offer for the 2019 Durfort Vivens, a bit over the EP price but under $75. The CT average score was 95, (21 notes) with recent notes from experienced tasters at 98. Keith Levenberg rated it 97 with a long, thoughtful and effusive note. Jeff Leve rated it 94. So here was a wine that could appeal to different palates, was red fruited, balanced and complex for under $75. I bought a ton. I also look at the trend in scores. If the overall score is 90, but recent notes (say 5 or so over the past year) average over 92, that’s an indication to me, in addition to the written notes, that the wine is improving.
_____________________________
“I was a glutton at the banquet and spilt the finest wine,” Mick Jagger, Wandering Spirit
|