smigdiggler
Posts: 3589
Joined: 12/15/2006 From: Napa Valley Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: geppetto Oh, I agree completely. The CT barrel project needs to play by the rules. I just think the charade that occurs (not just with the CT project) is humorous, because it suggests that the grape is the wine. Of course quality fruit is hugely important, but so is the winemaker, the barrel, the toasting, the blending and all other aspects that go into a quality product. Beckstoffer sells his GIII grapes to at least 20 different major wineries. I don't think Schrader, for example, is worried about, let's say, Stag's Leap accessing GIII grapes, even though the price difference is about $100 per bottle. This is the business that Beckstoffer is in and everybody knows it. If the CT project loses their juice, I think the most likely cause is a year with low yields. AB has numerous contracts that are based on tonnage, so if yields are particularly low, the little guys are the ones that lose out. Geppetto, The AB contracts are based on rows of vines. (going from memory...We are in block B1B and we are contracted to take all the fruit from rows 17-20) We can request whatever farming practices we desire, within a certain limit. i.e. leaf pulling, thinning, etc. but when it comes time to pay the bill, its determined by tonnage. So if a lean year happened, as 2011 was. we wouldnt get shut out, we would just get less. Now if they don't allow us to sign a contract next year, then we are shut out. BTW - if we are short and there are rows available, they try to sell on the spot, when the fruit is picked. at the point of harvest, tonnage is tonnage. I didnt want the group to think they would get pushed out if things got lean, if we have a contract, we will get some fruit.
_____________________________
Semi retired from the wine business, but can't seem to let go of opportunities when they present themselves PlaywrightWines on Instagram
|