Thomas Fogarty Winery
Santa Cruz - Skyline
Tasted November 4, 2016 by csimm with 447 views
Introduction
Tasted at the winery, which is in a very beautiful location with views for miles. The staff was very nice throughout the tasting.
Unfortunately, that's about where the pleasantries ended. With the exception of two very nice Chardonnays, the remainder of the lineup was utterly disappointing. Thin, lifeless, and diluted, the wines exhibited little-to-no personalities; in some cases, the wines were almost undrinkable. As mentioned in my individual tasting notes, the "In the Pursuit of Balance" methodologies practiced in the winemaking showed to disastrous effect. I don't disagree with the idea IPOB conceptually, but what I have found is that nearly EVERY producer who has latched on to this kumbaya trend has in fact not created a balanced wine, but has instead created forgettable wines without any personalities whatsoever. Not shockingly, Fogarty has fallen victim to this Scientology of winemaking. Their Manifesto of Balance (no I didn't make that up) cites that the genius of Pinot is in its subtly and poise. But what of character? What of depth? What of tiered flavor profiles? What of intensity? What of any discernible personality that tells you something, anything, about this wine?
Flight 1 (2 notes)
Its simplicity was especially highlighted when tasted alongside the 2012 Damiana Chardonnay, which was far superior.
Good cut and delineation of flavors, as well as a smooth, long finish. The QPR is a bit steep at $60 considering the totality of what this wine delivers. $40 would've been the fair barometer for this Chardonnay.
92-93 points. Could improve over the next 6 months, but operating pretty optimally at present.
Flight 2 (1 note)
I don't necessarily have an automatic aversion to "orange" wine, though I think it is a little trend folks who are simply trying to do something different have latched on to for the moment; I've had some wines in this style that have at least been interesting (Kevin Kelley's Salinia orange petillant wine is one example). But this Satsum creation was bitter, drying, and pithy. No sense of breadth at all. Not even the best Eggs Benedict pairing could help this goofy concoction.
Best forgotten, even as a science experiment...and especially as something served as part of a Signature Reserve Tasting that you pay for. A bit insulting actually.
Flight 3 (1 note)
Flight 4 (1 note)
Flight 5 (1 note)
It was around this time in the tasting that I started to inquire about the methodologies practiced in the winemaking. The explanation was something I should have picked up on from the first sip of the Pinots... ANSWER: "In the Pursuit of Balance." Oh brother.?!?!..
Ok, so I don't disagree with the idea IPOB conceptually, but what I have found is that nearly EVERY producer who has latched on to this kumbaya trend has in fact not created a balanced wine, but has instead created forgettable wines without any personalities whatsoever. Not shockingly, Fogarty has fallen victim to this Scientology of winemaking. Their Manifesto of Balance (no I didn't make that up) cites that the genius of Pinot is it subtly and poise. But what of character? What of depth? What of tiered flavor profiles? What of intensity? What of any discernible personality that tells you something, anything, about this wine? (Stepping off of my soapbox now).
84 generous points on this wine from me.
Flight 6 (1 note)
The "In the Pursuit of Balance" methodologies practiced in the winemaking showed to disastrous effect. As mentioned in my other notes about this producer, I don't disagree with the idea IPOB conceptually, but what I have found is that nearly EVERY producer who has latched on to this kumbaya trend has in fact not created a balanced wine, but has instead created forgettable wines without any personalities whatsoever. Not shockingly, Fogarty has fallen victim to this Scientology of winemaking. Their Manifesto of Balance (no I didn't make that up) cites that the genius of Pinot is in its subtly and poise. But what of character? What of depth? What of tiered flavor profiles? What of intensity? What of any discernible personality that tells you something, anything, about this wine? (Stepping off of my soapbox now).
Flight 7 (1 note)
The "In the Pursuit of Balance" methodologies practiced in the winemaking showed to disastrous effect. As mentioned in my other notes about this producer, I don't disagree with the idea IPOB conceptually, but what I have found is that nearly EVERY producer who has latched on to this kumbaya trend has in fact not created a balanced wine, but has instead created forgettable wines without any personalities whatsoever. Not shockingly, Fogarty has fallen victim to this Scientology of winemaking. Their Manifesto of Balance (no I didn't make that up) cites that the genius of Pinot is in its subtly and poise. But what of character? What of depth? What of tiered flavor profiles? What of intensity? What of any discernible personality that tells you something, anything, about this wine?
85 points, and unfortunately my best (and most generous) scoring of the Fogarty Pinots.
Flight 8 (1 note)
The "In the Pursuit of Balance" methodologies practiced in the winemaking showed to disastrous effect. As mentioned in my other notes about this producer, I don't disagree with the idea IPOB conceptually, but what I have found is that nearly EVERY producer who has latched on to this kumbaya trend has in fact not created a balanced wine, but has instead created forgettable wines without any personalities whatsoever. Not shockingly, Fogarty has fallen victim to this Scientology of winemaking. Their Manifesto of Balance (no I didn't make that up) cites that the genius of Pinot is in its subtly and poise. But what of character? What of depth? What of tiered flavor profiles? What of intensity? What of any discernible personality that tells you something, anything, about this wine?
Flight 9 (1 note)
Flight 10 (1 note)
Having this as the finale to a Signature Reserve Tasting (one that you pay for no less) was pretty insulting.