Just slightly oxidative with citrus and acid.

This champagne is a head-turner, especially considering the price and it's NV moniker. Floral, strawberry, minerals, bread dough.

There is good acidity to this and slight oak. Overall, it is relatively elegant for California. Towards that end, the palate is slightly thin.

This is a very different chardonnay. While this wine is impressive in it's flavor profile, it isn't that friendly to me. There is significant sulfur, briny minerality and racy acidity. This is for acid heads.

Apricot, high minerality, slightly tart, slight caramel on the finish. Overall, this does drink like an older chardonnay, with good complexity. Unfortunately, the sharp vanilla stands out a little too much, and seems out of place as this wine is not that rich. Nonetheless, this was fun to drink and interesting in the complex flavors/aromas.

This wine seemed a little too smooth and mellow for me. There was a touch of iron and some red fruit.

Iron and rocky minerality dominates, with enough elegant fruit to make it work.

Balanced nose of earth and minerality. I'm surprised this youngster is drinking so well already, although it is clearly well-fruited. It would be cool to try this in 3-5 years.

Big, spicy, extracted, ripe, modern Oregon style. Not my thing. Unscored.

I agree with ROCKNROLLER, 92 to 93. Light cherry, lots of earth, acid, tar, smoky, delightful.

The palate is kind of musty, slightly stewed fruit, touch of anise, a bit madirized, interesting, curious, tastes old. That's what I wrote, but I also scored it 92, so I must have meant that in a good way. :)