6/11/17, 9:35 AM - I suspect this is a vintage problem - 2013 was a poor vintage in Luxembourg and I believe 2014 was also quite poor for gewurtz. However the 2015 is much better, not only in terms of reputation but I've just tried the 2015 vintage of this today and so good that I bought a case!
11/14/14, 11:38 PM - I forgot to take notes but from recollection it didn't change much. Still quite young. Needed food which opened it up quite a bit.
1/5/14, 4:50 AM - I have two bottles of it but haven't tried it yet! I've also got the maiden vintage: 1992, which I also haven't tried but will soon.
1/5/14, 8:32 AM - I got a mixed case of various Nyetimber from Bordeaux Index a while back (92, 96, 98, 01, 03, 08 & some rosé and demi-sec). Good news: they still have cases left! Very reasonable price too and all the bottles are freshly labelled so presumably perfectly stored.
12/19/13, 2:30 PM - Interesting to hear that it was oaked. I thought that, but the waitress said it was unoaked! I really loved it. I also have some Hatzidakis Assyrtiko, which I bought from the Wine Society here in England, but I haven't tried it yet. Let me know if you have any other recommendations. Thanks!
12/21/13, 5:25 AM - Thank you Yiannis. That is very useful!
7/29/13, 4:27 PM - Hi Harley. Thanks for your comments but I thought I should clear up the assumption that I'm a novice with a Parker-palate, although I appreciate you were being humourous!! :)Firstly, I'm European, not American! Secondly, I drink quite a bit of Rioja (particularly the traditional type such as this and Lopez de Heredia) and have more than two cases of this wine alone, with this being my 5th bottle tried. I also have a case of the 2004 Ardanza but haven't tried it yet. So I am not venturing into the unknown! :)That said I am only in my early 30s and have only been drinking fine wine a few years now but I know how Rioja should be!It was popped and poured after a 1 hour journey where it was shaken up. I think it just needed some time and air, although it could be bottle variation. I didn't return the bottle nor I have marked as defective as I don't think it was truly defective. It's Rioja, it can be a volatile sometimes and perhaps prone to travel sickness. I think this just needed a long decant, which I wasn't able to give it. I concluded my note by saying it was bottle sickness and I do really think that's what it was, based on my very limited experience. I think it's a fair note and I wrote it primarily to remind myself that this may not travel well sometimes (I may correct that later if I find I was wrong) and to flag to others if they are interested. I've praised this wine in previous notes (in fact you commented on one saying you agreed with my assessment!). I think it's very, very good quality and value -- which is why I bought 2 cases! A result of my own tasting of it; I don't follow Parker.
Thanks for letting us know about this problem. We will review your comments and be in touch soon with an update.
Search