Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.
Manage Subscriptions
Important Update From the Founder
Read message >
Label borrowed from 1999
Label borrowed from 2001
Label borrowed from 2004
Label borrowed from 2004
Label borrowed from 1995
Label borrowed from 2005
Label borrowed from 2006
Label borrowed from 2007
Label borrowed from 2008
Label borrowed from 1992
Label borrowed from 1991
Label borrowed from 2009
Label borrowed from 2010
Label borrowed from 2011
Label borrowed from 2011
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2013
Label borrowed from 2013
Label borrowed from 2014
Label borrowed from 2015
Label borrowed from 2015
Label borrowed from 2016
Label borrowed from 2017
Community Tasting Notes 13
-
Bethesda Paul wrote: 89 points
July 25, 2015 - Opened nicely after decanted for two hours. Cherry notes. Not a big finish.
-
wineismylife wrote:
June 19, 2008 - WIMLNR. This wine just seems to keep fading with every bottle that we've opened as of late. If you have any of these people start popping them now and report back. I'm betting they need to go and go now.
-
wineismylife wrote: 88 points
June 7, 2008 - WIML88
Tasted June 7, 2008.
No formal notes. Opened and served immediately. Dark garnet color in the glass, slightly opaque throughout. Nose and palate are a bit muddled showing mostly red fruits including some currants on both. Light acidity and tannins, medium body. Blowing sediment. Seems to be fading a bit. Drink now. -
wineismylife wrote: 89 points
April 28, 2008 - WIML89. The bottle had a bit more of cooked fruit like it had been heat damaged somewhere along the way. Overall these wines are definitely ready to go so drink up.
-
eden93 wrote: 85 points
February 22, 2008 - Strong deep pink color, perfume and blackberry nose. Thick and aromatic, strong cassis at first, then green and black pepper. Others said tannic, but I don't taste that at all - very light, if any, tannins. Still, pleasant sipping, and easy to gulp as well. A good drink, but fairly average. I've had cheaper Spanish reds that rated higher.
1 - 5 of 13
More notes
Pro Reviews 3
Add a Pro ReviewVinous
-
By Josh Raynolds
March/April 2006, IWC Issue #125 (link)(Ramos Pinto Duas Quintas Tinto Reserva Douro) Subscribe to see review text.
i-WineReview.com
-
Report 2: Red Table Wines of Portugal, 1/1/2006 (link)
(Ramos-Pinto Duas Quintas Reserva Douro) Subscribe to see review text.
JancisRobinson.com
-
By Jancis Robinson, MW
2/5/2005 (link)(Ramos Pinto, Duas Quintas Reserva Douro Red) Subscribe to see review text.
Wine Definition
- Vintage 2000
- Type Red
- Producer Ramos Pinto
- Varietal Red Blend
- Designation Duas Quintas Reserva
- Vineyard n/a
- Country Portugal
- Region Douro
- SubRegion n/a
- Appellation Douro
Community Holdings
- Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
- In Cellars 8 (22%)
- Consumed 29 (78%)
Food Pairing
No food pairings available.
Who Likes This Wine
0 votes.
More About This Wine
Articles
- ProducerRamos Pinto
- VarietyRed Blend
- CountryPortugal
- RegionDouro
- AppellationDouro
Add Articles
- Wine2000 Ramos Pinto Douro Duas Quintas Reserva (add)
- FamilyRamos Pinto Douro Duas Quintas Reserva (add)
- ProducerRamos Pinto
- VarietalRed Blend
- DesignationDuas Quintas Reserva (add)
- CountryPortugal
- RegionDouro
- AppellationDouro