Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Red

2016 Bevan Cellars Sugarloaf Mountain Vineyard

Red Bordeaux Blend

  • USA
  • California
  • Napa Valley
(Add Drinking Window)
CT95.5 38 reviews
2016
2016
2016
2016
N.V.
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2018
2018
Label borrowed from 2018
2018
Label borrowed from 2018
2018
Label borrowed from 2014
2014
Label borrowed from 2014
2014
Label borrowed from 2014
2014
Label borrowed from 2019
2019
Label borrowed from 2019
2019
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2012
2012

Community Tasting Notes 29

  • GiWineDoc Likes this wine: 95 points

    November 18, 2023 - Big wine! Powerful nose. Cab franc comes through with big blue fruit. Fun wine

  • msuwine wrote: 92 points

    June 6, 2023 - How many Russell Bevan Cabernets does one guy need? It’s a question I’ve asked myself over the past 10 years, as Bevan’s empire has grown not only within his namesake product (10+ vineyards and counting) but also as he conquers new labels as a winemaker (e.g., Carter, PerUs, Lerner). This question is more important because Russell's style is the opposite of shy: without a doubt, his wines will provide inky aromatics, big fruit, silky tannin, nice acidity… boozy within (some) limits…similar chords, no matter the site. I do not worship at the altar of dirt, but Bevan leaves a mark, as do others in the Valley (e.g., Mike Smith, Kirk Venge, TRB, Benoit). I like - and buy - many of these wines, but they bear the brand of their maker. To repeat the question, how many versions of the same thing do you need?

    To test this proposition - in a very small way - I opened two bottles Russell Bevan made from the 2016 vintage, a PerUs Alessio and a Bevan SugarLoaf. Both were juicy, sweet, silky, and tasty. Both lacked notes that were savory, earthy, or non-confectionary. The Bevan was better (and cheaper), but both tasted, more or less, the same - not identical, but similar. In other words, Bevan's wines seem like Maroon 5’s songs: the lead voice is so distinctive, they all sound the same. If you like it, great - but there’s no need to buy (or listen to) more than a few.

    - PerUs Alessio. Dark red in color; full in body; aromas of boysenberry tart, milk chocolate, and rock candy. Flavors of blueberry, mocha-chino, and black licorice, with a sweet finish that has enough acidity to go for awhile (but not enough tannin to keep things interesting).The label says that this $300 wine is “established by a group of passionate people with the belief that life is not defined by material possession, but by the relationships.” As I barf in my mouth about this HBS self-importance - do the “relationships” pay for the wine or is it the carried interest loophole? - I confess to seeing this bottle as being as soulless as it is confectionary. Blend of 55% Cabernet Sauvignon, 30% Cab Franc, and 15% Merlot. 15.2% alcohol. 90 right now, even if I ignore the label. First time - and last time - purchase.

    - Bevan Sugarloaf. I loved this wine a few years ago (9/20 - 95 points), but tonight it seems like - and context is king - part of a Willy Wonka experience. Similarly dark in color and full in body, the wine offers aromas of blueberry pie, Hershey bar, and cocoa powder. The flavors sing the same tune (oompa?), with notes of cherry ice cream, fresh leather, and peppercorn, with a pleasant finish. The 55% Cab Franc provides ballast against the juiciness of this vintage, along with 40% Merlot and 5% Petit Verdot. 14.7% alcohol. 92+ right now, but I suspect it will be better in a few years.

    To be a bit counter-intuitive, the point of my review here is less qualitative and more quantitative. These wines are tasty, within a certain category - but there is a rate of diminishing returns to buying wines made by the same guy with different labels. I do enjoy Russell Bevan wines, but I need about 6 per vintage… not 20. And, if I had to make a recommendation after tasting many in his portfolio over the years, I’d err towards his own label… and, even within that, go with the Ontogeny. At $100 of pure fruit goodness, you’re in pop music gold - Moves like Jagger, go with the flow, and don’t sweat the small stuff...

    3 people found this helpful Comments (5)
  • PDXWineO Likes this wine: 96 points

    May 7, 2023 - Popped and poured at Carina Lounge. Was pretty tight at first but opened up as the night went on. Typical Bevan with Great texture, power and flavors.

  • dlcass Likes this wine: 97 points

    April 22, 2023 - Beautifully integrated wine that is striking and special! Nose of red fruit, forest floor, menthol, and spice. Very elevating on the palate with striking acidity and youth. Very long finish. Saint Emilion comes to mind immediately.

  • Geaux Tigers Likes this wine: 95 points

    February 17, 2023 - 2 hr decant but lovely nose on open bursting out of the decanter with perfume

    Nose- sweet cigar box, cedar, melted milk chocolate, spiced sugar plums.

    Palate- complex and elegant, especially for a Bevan, more spice plums, red dried tart fruit, dried blueberries, but earthy undertones, long long finish, more developed and more secondary notes and less fruit than expected for a 2016 at this stage.

    Feels like this is past the usual belligerent youth I find in the Sugarloaf blend. This was, dare I say exuberant yet classy. This might be the closest thing to BDX I’ve ever tasted from Russell.

    That being said, in the final verdict and with 3.5-4 hrs of air, it became apparent the Cabernet Franc locked down the Merlot in what appears to have been an ongoing WWE cage match in the decanter and on our palates. A lot more boisterous fruit began to show up in our final glasses, a hint of what could have been and an ode to what will be. Minus points to the drinkers for lack of proper air time.

    Leaving 95 on the board, 98-99 potential if the fruit unlocks and oh so excited for that!

1 - 5 of 29 More notes

Pro Reviews 3

Add a Pro Review

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.

Manage Subscriptions

JebDunnuck.com

  • By Jeb Dunnuck
    North Coast Part 1: Napa Valley's Incredible 2016s, 1/31/2019 (link)

    (Bevan Cellars Sugarloaf Mountain Vineyard Proprietary Red Wine) Subscribe to see review text.

Vinous

  • By Antonio Galloni
    Napa Valley’s Extraordinary 2016 Cabernets (Dec 2018), 12/1/2018 (link)

    (Bevan Cellars Proprietary Red Sugarloaf Mountain Napa Valley Red) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Antonio Galloni
    Brilliance in Napa Valley: 2016 & 2015 Cabernets (Jan 2018), 1/18/2018 (link)

    (Bevan Cellars Proprietary Red Sugarloaf Mountain Napa Valley Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Wine Definition

  • Vintage 2016
  • Type Red
  • Producer Bevan Cellars
  • Varietal Red Bordeaux Blend
  • Designation n/a
  • Vineyard Sugarloaf Mountain Vineyard
  • Country USA
  • Region California
  • SubRegion Napa Valley
  • Appellation Napa Valley
  • UPC Codes 451381077509, 451968777501

Community Holdings

  • Pending Delivery 6 (0%)
  • In Cellars 1,085 (73%)
  • Consumed 393 (26%)

Food Pairing

No food pairings available.

Who Likes This Wine

100% Like It  28 votes

More About This Wine

Articles

Report a Problem

Close
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close