Community Tasting Notes 12

• Frabjous Likes this wine: 90 points

  December 14, 2018 - Shouldn’t have gone through the rest of these so fast as this one - the 5th of 6 - is really showing greater complexity and depth. Hold on to the last one . . .

  Comment

• VinoHunter wrote: 85 points

  October 25, 2018 - Well I don’t think one needs to “pound sand” as someone early said. However I get the sentiment, nothing fancy, nothing really that good, serve this wine to your friends that don’t know any better. I do think this wine fairs better than other bottles in its price category that you can find at your local store. In the end I would rather read Last Bottle’s write up on this wine more than I would want to drink it again...

  1 person found this helpful Comment

• mrmikemtr Does not like this wine: 86 points

  July 24, 2018 - Better on day 2. Perhaps sustainable is not the same as interesting? Just sayin’.

  2 people found this helpful Comment

• pickhardt wrote: 86 points

  May 29, 2018 - A little dull - not much acid. I didn't pay much, so I'm not entirely disappointed, but I'm also not disappointed I don't have more.

  2 people found this helpful Comment

• mrmikemtr Does not like this wine: 85 points

  May 27, 2018 - Drinks like I overpaid for it. 10$ is too much for this $5 wine.....er, flavored koolaid. Table wine at best. Zero structure. Zero aging potential. Find something else. Pound sand!!!

  2 people found this helpful Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2016
• Type Red
• Producer Dalliance
• Varietal Red Blend
• Designation Red Wine
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region California
• SubRegion North Coast
• Appellation Lake County
• UPC Code 857680001908

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 7 (2%)
• In Cellars 141 (34%)
• Consumed 263 (64%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine