Community Tasting Notes 13

• WinePT wrote: 77 points

  August 10, 2010 - Horrible cheap Burgundy that was a little better on day 2.

  Comment

• cliffo41 wrote: 68 points

  February 1, 2010 - Of the people that review no one likes it, and nearly everyone rates in the high 80s. I don't get it. Frankly, a 68 is probably generous. Thin, weak wine. No nose - seriously, it could be water in the glass. Extremely dry, somewhat sour finish. No complexity, nothing interesting. The Mrs. says "not my kind of wine."

  Comment

• WetRock wrote:

  July 15, 2009 - Plastic cork. Barely any nose to speak of even after a couple days open. Straight, linear red wine that is richer than I expected. Couldn't identify it as Pinot but couldn't say it wasn't either. Shows some balancing acids but not strongly. It's just red wine. Is it a value for $3? Hard to say. I'm not buying anymore since there was nothing to make me want more. But there is certainly nothing flawed about this wine or that stands out as being a big negative either.

  Comment

• AustinJC wrote:

  July 15, 2009 - I have to agree with everyone else. Little to no nose to speak of. A little red fruit and spice. The palate is of tart cherries and maybe a hint of fig, which is what I've come to expect from low end Pinot Noir. This wine is definitely not worth the $15 tag. There are amazing wines to be had at that price point and this fell very short.

  Comment

• jeffal66 wrote: 82 points

  July 1, 2009 - No notes. Very light, non offensive. Bought for $6 (I think) in PA.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2005
• Type Red
• Producer Hangtime Cellars
• Varietal Pinot Noir
• Designation n/a
• Vineyard n/a
• Country France
• Region Burgundy
• SubRegion n/a
• Appellation Bourgogne
• UPC Code 877397000605

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 20 (38%)
• Consumed 33 (62%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine