Community Tasting Notes 3

• David964c2 wrote: 80 points

  January 4, 2011 - Very dissappointed with this wine, although was picked up heavily discounted. I guess that really tells the story of this wine. Nothing interesting at all with this wine. What ever happened to the old Rosemount wines? they used to be really good. Ah wel, have one bottle left, will use it for cooking wine.

  Comment

• IcemanUK wrote: 84 points

  January 26, 2010 - Good colour aging at the edges. Subtle flavours of berries with claret-like earthy undertones.

  Comment

• tonsta wrote: 75 points

  May 17, 2007 - Bought at local discount wine chain. Paid $20 which was apparently 50% off... Obviously, by the level discounting I wasn't expecting too much from this wine, but even then my expectations were way too high. My wife and I were bitterly disappointed with it. I don't think there was any thing wrong with the wine (maybe slightly cooked). Possibly the most uninteresting wine I have ever had, it had no nose and there was no fruit, no acidity, no tannins, it was just a tasteless wine. There are plently of better sub $20 wines out there... not to mention $40 examples of a better shiraz cab.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 2

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2002
• Type Red
• Producer Rosemount Estate
• Varietal Shiraz Blend
• Designation Mountain Blue
• Vineyard n/a
• Country Australia
• Region New South Wales
• SubRegion Central Ranges
• Appellation Mudgee

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 24 (47%)
• Consumed 27 (53%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine