Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.
Manage SubscriptionsCommunity Tasting Notes 5
-
Rosschum wrote: 70 points
July 22, 2013 - The wine was definitely past its prime. It was by no means the worst wine I've ever had, but it wasn't good either. There was no real complexity left in this wine. It's still drinkable, but it wouldn't be my first choice.
-
CaliCabAddict wrote: 85 points
March 8, 2012 - The nose is essentially dead. Small amounts of fruit over nothing else. The palate is slightly better with cherries and strawberries coming through. No oak, no complexity. This wine is spent and past its prime but still holding up well considering its pedigree.
-
Dana119 wrote: 60 points
December 23, 2010 - Disgusting
-
JRStimmie wrote: 89 points
January 27, 2010 - Dense old shows age. Drank with Glenn dale and John with a caymus pairing
-
wabi47 wrote: 82 points
October 24, 2006 - fruit is mostiy gone, but this is still clean; cigar and leather, drinkable with food; past its prime;
Wine Definition
- Vintage 1996
- Type Red
- Producer Kendall-Jackson
- Varietal Cabernet Sauvignon
- Designation Vintner's Reserve
- Vineyard n/a
- Country USA
- Region California
- SubRegion n/a
- Appellation California
- UPC Code 081584013174
Community Holdings
- Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
- In Cellars 46 (49%)
- Consumed 47 (51%)
Food Pairing
Who Likes This Wine
More About This Wine
Articles
- ProducerKendall-Jackson
- VarietyCabernet Sauvignon
- CountryUSA
- RegionCalifornia
- AppellationCalifornia
Add Articles
- Wine1996 Kendall-Jackson Cabernet Sauvignon Vintner's Reserve (add)
- FamilyKendall-Jackson Cabernet Sauvignon Vintner's Reserve (add)
- ProducerKendall-Jackson
- VarietalCabernet Sauvignon
- DesignationVintner's Reserve (add)
- CountryUSA
- RegionCalifornia
- AppellationCalifornia