Important Update From the Founder Read message >
Red

2010 Pétrus

Red Bordeaux Blend

  • France
  • Bordeaux
  • Libournais
  • Pomerol
(Add Drinking Window)
CT95.5 13 reviews
2010
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2011
2011
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2011
2011
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2011
2011
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2009
2009
Label borrowed from 2008
2008
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2008
2008
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2012
2012
Label borrowed from 2008
2008
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2007
2007
Label borrowed from 2013
2013
Label borrowed from 2014
2014
Label borrowed from 2006
2006
Label borrowed from 2006
2006
Label borrowed from 2006
2006
Label borrowed from 2015
2015
Label borrowed from 2005
2005

Community Tasting Notes 13

  • glou.sf Likes this wine: 94 points

    February 29, 2024 - From magnum. Deep, dark, and incredibly concentrated nose with dark fruit, tobacco, spices, and tar. The palate is similar with dark berries, cherries, a hint of chocolate, more spices, and underwood. Finish is quite long. A massive wine that feels very extracted and concentrated, although I didn't feel it was out of balance, just a profile that may not be everyone's cup of tea. I would love to see how this evolves, but I doubt I will get the chance... 94+

  • Cailles wrote: 93 points

    May 15, 2022 - 6 Vintages Le Pin vs Petrus vs Lafleur vs Other Pomerol: All wines tasted single blind, not decanted. Served in 6 vintage flights with a alternating 4th Pomerol added to every flight. A few observations: 1) Le Pin handily won this tasting, for me (4 out of 6 vintages at 96/97 pts) and the consensus. Made in a charming way, with loads of perfectly integrated, luxurious oak-derived notes, this wines drink well young and works very well in a larger tasting like this were you can’t follow the wines over an evening. Complex, round, intense, sexy yet elegant. 2) Lafleur came in second, despite mostly only hinting at its potential with very high complexity, it’s wonderful, typical herbal and earthy notes, all embedded in an impeccable, light structural frame. But they need time. 3) Most vintages of Petrus underperformed tonight (all below 95 pts). They would have needed more time to open up and come together. 4) 2009/10 vintages are great and unsurprisingly got the highest scores, 2008 confirmed it status as a Bdx vintage that is excellent to drink today. More information/rankings in the tasting story.

    TN: This Petrus had a tough stand after the fantastic Le Pin in the glass before. It showed much less expressive, especially on the nose which almost was non-existent. A bottle two years back (rated 95 pts) showed more open. Luckily, the palate had more to give with ripe dark berries, some hints of chocolate, minerality and a refreshing herbal component. But never as open and complex as the Le Pin or the Lafleur. The wine had a good freshness, good balance, nice creaminess but the tannins didn’t seem fully ready and will need more time to soften. My guess is that this would have needed a lot of time in the decanter to shine although some in our group seemed to like it much more than I did.

    Decanting: My guess is that 3-4 hours in a decanter would have helped here.

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • Collector1855 wrote: 95 points

    May 11, 2022 - Petrus vs. Le Pin vs. Lafleur 2004-2011, blind (Fribourg): Dark and ripe fruit, darker and riper than the others. Same on the palate, really dark and dense, may be a bit too ripe? I don't know but surely this needs time as well. Dont open before 2028. 95+

    1 person found this helpful Comment
  • sirpat00 wrote: 92 points

    May 9, 2022 - Pétrus vs Lafleur vs Le Pin (Fribourg): 6 vintage face-off (2006-2011) Pétrus vs Lafleur vs Le Pin vs alternating Pomerol pirate. The wines were served in vintage flights of 4 and not decanted. Main observations were: 1/ Le Pin knocked it out of the park coming in first in 4 out of 6 vintages while Pétrus came in last with not a single vintage win (Lafleur came in best in two off-vintages, 2006 and 2008), 2/ The best overall vintage was 2009 (runner-up 2010) while 2006 came in last (scoring range 85-92), 3/ best bottle was Le Pin 2009 (99), followed by Pétrus 2010 and Le Pin 2010 (98 each), 4/ best pirate was Clos L’Eglise 2009 (97). List of wines per score included in the tasting story.

    Tasting note:
    Felt a bit heavy-handed in terms of oak deployment. Pretty extracted with the fruit leaning towards plum. Some fresher herbal layers. Quite a brute at this stage. The palate more fruity and fresh, but not really expressive with the last few drops exhibiting a nice sense of purity.

  • 9400KG wrote:

    December 24, 2021 - Na

1 - 5 of 13 More notes

Pro Reviews 14

Add a Pro Review

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.

Manage Subscriptions

Vinous

  • By Neal Martin
    Squares & Circles: Bordeaux ‘10 At Ten (Apr 2020), 4/1/2020 (link)

    (Petrus Petrus Red) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Neal Martin
    Squares & Circles: Bordeaux ‘10 At Ten (Apr 2020), 4/1/2020 (link)

    (Petrus Petrus Red) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Julia Harding, MW
    2/12/2020 (link)

    (Petrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Decanter

  • By Jane Anson
    Bordeaux 2010: Ten years on, 1/30/2020 (link)

    (Petrus, Pomerol, Bordeaux, France, Red) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    1/30/2020 (link)

    (Petrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Vinous

  • By Neal Martin
    Sharing Alike: Petrus 1947 - 2015 (Sep 2018), 9/1/2018 (link)

    (Petrus Petrus Red) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    7/17/2015 (link)

    (Petrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    1/22/2014 (link)

    (Petrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

The World of Fine Wine

  • June 2011, Issue #32 (link)

    (Pétrus) Subscribe to see review text.

Vinous

  • By Ian D'Agata
    May/June 2011, IWC Issue #156 (link)

    (Chateau Petrus Pomerol) Subscribe to see review text.

JancisRobinson.com

  • By Jancis Robinson, MW
    4/6/2011 (link)

    (Ch Pétrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

Winedoctor

  • By Chris Kissack
    April 2011 (link)

    (Petrus (Pomerol)) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Chris Kissack
    April 2011 (link)

    (Petrus Pomerol Red) Subscribe to see review text.

View From the Cellar

  • By John Gilman
    Mar/Apr 2011, Issue #32, The 2010 Bordeaux Vintage: Very Ripe, Very Tannic and With Just A Few Great Successes

    (Château Pétrus) Subscribe to see review text.

Wine Definition

  • Vintage 2010
  • Type Red
  • Producer Pétrus
  • Varietal Red Bordeaux Blend
  • Designation n/a
  • Vineyard n/a
  • Country France
  • Region Bordeaux
  • SubRegion Libournais
  • Appellation Pomerol
  • UPC Code 087000335721

Community Holdings

  • Pending Delivery 105 (5%)
  • In Cellars 1,505 (76%)
  • Consumed 363 (18%)

Food Pairing

No food pairings available.

Who Likes This Wine

100% Like It  5 votes

More About This Wine

Articles

Add Articles

Report a Problem

Close
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC.

Report a Problem

Close