As I mentioned in my last tasting note, this wine is a bit past its prime, as the fruit has faded. However, it still is a delicious glass of wine. There are more earthy notes, the acidity is a bit less. I generally prefer this wine at 5 to 6 years past the vintage.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Rather underwhelmed. Seems like fruit notes are fading, leaving a morass of dark indistinct flavors. There are other “heavy” Fleuries that I think are better — Anne Sophie Dubois’s Les Lubarons and L’Alchimiste come to mind.
I’ve got one more bottle left, and plan to drink it sooner rather than later.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
From night two. On night one, this was just a bit surly and angry at being woken up from its nap. 24 hours later, it's a bit more open, still tight and a little ungiving, but fairly drinkable if tolerant of a little structure. There's a fair amount of vegetal-ly green stuff all over this wine, on the nose, on the palate, but it's moderate, and adds to the classic nature of this vintage. Darker red plum fruit, quite a bit of mineral and slightly astringent, chalky tannin. Better with food for sure. I'd advise hiding away for another couple of years to soften up just a bit more, when it will be deliciously classic.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Drank during Thanksgiving dinner. Probably a bit past its prime, but still quite an enjoyable. An earthy wine, with faded red fruits, and fully resolved tannins. No detailed notes, just enjoyment and a great meal.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/26/2024 - Saxman1984 wrote:
As I mentioned in my last tasting note, this wine is a bit past its prime, as the fruit has faded. However, it still is a delicious glass of wine. There are more earthy notes, the acidity is a bit less. I generally prefer this wine at 5 to 6 years past the vintage.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/3/2024 - Big Juicy Red wrote:
Rather underwhelmed. Seems like fruit notes are fading, leaving a morass of dark indistinct flavors. There are other “heavy” Fleuries that I think are better — Anne Sophie Dubois’s Les Lubarons and L’Alchimiste come to mind.
I’ve got one more bottle left, and plan to drink it sooner rather than later.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/8/2023 - Sotto325 wrote: 90 Points
I value highly these greatly undervalued wines but was mightily disappointed this evening . ALANR’s review has it on point. Hold and hope.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/2/2023 - alanr wrote: 90 Points
From night two. On night one, this was just a bit surly and angry at being woken up from its nap. 24 hours later, it's a bit more open, still tight and a little ungiving, but fairly drinkable if tolerant of a little structure. There's a fair amount of vegetal-ly green stuff all over this wine, on the nose, on the palate, but it's moderate, and adds to the classic nature of this vintage. Darker red plum fruit, quite a bit of mineral and slightly astringent, chalky tannin. Better with food for sure. I'd advise hiding away for another couple of years to soften up just a bit more, when it will be deliciously classic.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/23/2023 - Saxman1984 wrote:
Drank during Thanksgiving dinner. Probably a bit past its prime, but still quite an enjoyable. An earthy wine, with faded red fruits, and fully resolved tannins. No detailed notes, just enjoyment and a great meal.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment