2016 Scarecrow Cabernet Sauvignon

Community Tasting Notes (26) Avg Score: 97.4 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View csimm's profile
  • Report Issue

  6/1/2023 - csimm wrote: 97 Points

  2016 Napa Cults Blind - and a few Champs and such for fun: This was the first wine in the tasting that seemed less uptight and unyielding. Here, a plushness and savoriness shows. A bit fruity at first, but with a textual seamlessness that seems to indicate a top tier specimen. The overall profile is fairly simple at first, but a healthy injection of O2 pushes out complexity and layered flavoring. Purple and black fruited (possibly the Vice Versa M7? – WRONG again lame-o), this picks up speed and rises to the top level of performance when compared to its peers in the lineup. One of the favorites of the group. With a few hours of open air, this could be opened even now, but wiser minds recommend holding for another 3-4 years. A top wine.

  3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Cristal2000's profile
  • Report Issue

  5/17/2023 - Cristal2000 Likes this wine:

  This was a 2016 vintage blind of: Abreu Thorevilos, Colgin IX, MacDonald, Scarecrow, Bond St. Eden, Eisele, Futo Oakville, Colgin Tychson and Vice Versa M7. Each wine had a decant of approximately five hours before the first sip, except for MacDonald, which had around three, and the Futo, which I believe was PnP. There were nine tasters, including CSIMM1161, wine proprietors and a prominent winemaker.
  
  I’d really love to post notes on all these wines, but unfortunately time is scarce, and I don’t think I would be able to get to it anytime soon. I am sure CSIMM will post a ton on each, so that should fill the gap. Instead, I am going to give the broad strokes here.
  
  The first thing to note is all these wines could have used more air, especially the MacDonald. We shorted it in the tasting, and I think there was an impact on how it showed. The other thing that could have impacted how the wines showed is bottle shock. Most of these bottles were packed onto an airplane a couple days prior. While I didn’t note any overtly off bottles, there is no doubt it could have played a role.
  
  I know a lot of folks that hate blinds. It can really test your palate, and crowing a winner means the other great bottles must “lose”. If you haven’t done it before, it can also wear you down and things can blend, so it does take a methodology and consistency to do it well. That said, all these wines were spectacular.
  
  While we didn’t have the group rank order them all, we did ask for a top 3. The consensus was 1. Magnificent 7 2. Futo and 3. Scarecrow. There were certainly others than received votes in the top 3, but overall, it was uniform across the group. Those top three were easily 99-100 pt wines, and the others were not far behind. A few comments on each (in no particular order outside the top 3):
  
  1. Magnificent 7: almost universally the #1 wine in the tasting, this had all the elements of perfection. Suave and powerful, with super refined tannins, excellent purity, unreal depth, and a finish for days. Nothing harsh and pure class without any element out of balance.
  
  2. Futo: super focused wine with precision, this wrapped power and grace into a regal package. Showed dark chocolate and powerful fruit intensity backed up by impressive levels of freshness and acidity. Simply outstanding.
  
  3. Scarecrow: the most opulent, plush, and sexy wine of the bunch. While some of the other wines were trying to get all the pieces to fit together, this one was complete on every level. Beautifully integrated with supple tannins and wonderful energy and balance.
  
  4. Colgin IX: the only mountain/hillside wine of the bunch. This wine really progressed over the course of the tasting to the point where it was gaining on the leaders. Lovely red soil profile with deep mineral driven flavors, the mid palate began expanding over time and produced a complex, powerful yet refined wine with fantastic length.
  
  5. MacDonald: this was one of the wines that was a bit discombobulated, and I attribute that mostly to lack of decant time. It showed more spice and woodsy character than usual and was a little rough around the edges despite clearly having the class, pedigree, and overall intensity to be amongst the best wines in Napa.
  
  6. Colgin Tychson: this had a soft, supple entry with opulent fruit and gorgeous floral notes. The mid palate stayed tight throughout, and it never really blossomed into what I am sure will be an epic wine. I love this bottling, and this is going to be spectacular with a bit more time.
  
  7. Eisele: another wine here that needed more time to unfurl. This showed possibly the best complexity of the bunch, both on the nose and in the glass. It had all the hallmark savory character, but the fruit was wound up tight and there was a bit of oak obscuring things. I’ve had this when its blown my mind, just needs more air or more time.
  
  8. Abreu Thorevilos: the most disappointing wine for me in this tasting. I was expecting it to vie for top honors and it couldn’t get out of its own way. It was super unresolved and reductive, with oak and tannin obscuring most everything. This is a fabulous vineyard and winemaker, so I am sure it will come around, and part of me wants to attribute this showing to bottle shock.
  
  9. Bond St Eden: another wine that was within striking distance of the leaders. Rich, textured, beautiful and still grippy, it showed a ton of class with hallmark red earth notes and killer concentration and length.

  3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Santaliz's profile
  • Report Issue

  10/29/2022 - Santaliz Likes this wine: 94 Points

  Excited and therefore expected more from this 2016. Good but not sure 97 based on the fruit left.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View AaronMaxwell's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/7/2022 - AaronMaxwell Likes this wine: 98 Points

  This was my favorite Scarecrow yet. Rich blueberry and Rutherford dust. Huge wine, but still elegant and sultry. After 2 hours, it began changing and really opening up. It never peaked before we finished it :)

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Baxterna's profile
  • Report Issue

  6/4/2022 - Baxterna Likes this wine: 100 Points

  This is the most delicious, magnificent bottle of wine I’ve ever had! It is perfectly balanced with complex California style fruit balanced with a perfect acidity, smooth tannins, gentle alcohol, and silky finish. I cannot imagine ever having a better glass of wine in my presence. If there is a wine I would enjoy more than this one, I would be in heaven. It didn’t require decanting, though we did as we enjoyed it over the course of about an hour. I cannot say it improved necessarily since this was my new benchmark for what 100 taste like in my mouth. The more wine I taste, the more refined my personal calibration. This is my newest pinnacle of wine perfection!

  3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 26 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.