Fruity. Few tannins. A basic table red, not complex w lots of flavors. Inexpensive. Something I can still enjoy w those who can't discern the differences in reds
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Second bottle of this was much better than the first, showing some spicy cherry and rose petal notes. Quite good for a cheap wine--may be demonstrative of the good vintage, even at this level.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
10/27/2012 - Danswine wrote: 84 Points
Fruity. Few tannins. A basic table red, not complex w lots of flavors. Inexpensive. Something I can still enjoy w those who can't discern the differences in reds
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/16/2011 - Halgal26 wrote: 84 Points
Not too bad for a cheap wine
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/9/2011 - Laurenmilam wrote: 70 Points
Pretty awful, you get what you pay for...
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/26/2007 - drewrowe wrote: 84 Points
Drank over 2 nights with simple home cooked dinners--drinkable but not memorable. Don't think I'd buy again.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/7/2007 - IlonaN wrote: 87 Points
Second bottle of this was much better than the first, showing some spicy cherry and rose petal notes. Quite good for a cheap wine--may be demonstrative of the good vintage, even at this level.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment