good but not overwhelming nose gives way to a flabby blackberry taste which is not the best result one would expect from pinot noir in Patagonia. Maybe with time this will become more nuanced and subtle. The acidity is a bit lacking suggesting that this should have been better two years ago. Good.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/17/2007 - Claudio161 wrote: 91 Points
South American Wine Blind Tasting (Tango Sur Restaurant, Chicago, IL (Northside)): Sight: Appealing dark and sensuous color
Nose: Some heat on the nose - also some type of "off smell" that later blew off
Taste: Real good taste. Coke, cherry, dark red and black tree fruits. Burned toast.
Overall: Just a very nice wine. 91 points
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/17/2007 - KeithAkers wrote: 91 Points
south of the border night (tango sur, chicago IL): nose: nice soft fruit forward nose. soft cherry, floral notes, blueberry, and slight hints of strawberry
taste: very smooth and silky on the mouth. cherry, strawberry, and floral notes mostly on the mouth
overall: I like this. it's a really interesting wine with some really good polish on it
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/17/2007 - Steve Jones wrote: 91 Points
South American Wine Tasting Diner (Tango Sur, Chicago, IL): Pinot Noir 60% Malbec 40% Argentina. Lots of cherries and toasty heat on the nose and palate. Nice suppleness in the flavors, decent finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/21/2007 - Omar Khayyam wrote: 83 Points
good but not overwhelming nose gives way to a flabby blackberry taste which is not the best result one would expect from pinot noir in Patagonia. Maybe with time this will become more nuanced and subtle. The acidity is a bit lacking suggesting that this should have been better two years ago. Good.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment