Based on my last experience I opened this to make coq au vin, assuming it was well past peak. However, it surprised me. Some high toned red fruit with a hint of aged balsamic, bit of earthiness. Actually pretty solid, definitely merits a higher score than the 80 I gave in decade ago
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
This was the best bottle of the three - acceptable level of red fruit with some depth. It had thrown a LOT of sediment, had to throw out most of the last glass. But at least I could drink most of it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Well, I actually drank this bottle and since I rated the last one I threw away a 79 then gave this an 80 though "good" is stretching it a bit. Tolerable; much less of the burnt rubber and at times I thought "this is drinkable". I opened this only because my wife needed some wine to put in beef stew. NO MORE MYSTERY WINES FOR ME - EVER
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
I guess I am lucky enough to have my half-dozen bottles from the center of the GOOD Garagiste palette. Cellar storage has been kind to my bottles, and the strawberry-cherry, barely raspberry, has softened to the point that it is currently delivering all I ask in a good Spanish red; the acid, tannin and fruit to match up with a perfectly medium-rare Steak Fiorentina. I AM a Grenache whore, but that said, there is really nothing NOT-to-like in my bottles in their present state. I have 3 bottles left, which I will drink in the next 2-3 years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
2/4/2022 - JCGuthrie wrote: 87 Points
Based on my last experience I opened this to make coq au vin, assuming it was well past peak. However, it surprised me. Some high toned red fruit with a hint of aged balsamic, bit of earthiness. Actually pretty solid, definitely merits a higher score than the 80 I gave in decade ago
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/25/2021 - europat55 wrote: 92 Points
1977-1990 Vintage Ports (Blind Tasting) (Zoom): Nose: 91.5 Palate: 91.5 (Tasted blind)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/1/2018 - skifree wrote: 83 Points
This was the best bottle of the three - acceptable level of red fruit with some depth. It had thrown a LOT of sediment, had to throw out most of the last glass. But at least I could drink most of it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/8/2016 - skifree wrote: 80 Points
Well, I actually drank this bottle and since I rated the last one I threw away a 79 then gave this an 80 though "good" is stretching it a bit. Tolerable; much less of the burnt rubber and at times I thought "this is drinkable". I opened this only because my wife needed some wine to put in beef stew. NO MORE MYSTERY WINES FOR ME - EVER
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/21/2016 - Canuckgiver Likes this wine: 88 Points
I guess I am lucky enough to have my half-dozen bottles from the center of the GOOD Garagiste palette. Cellar storage has been kind to my bottles, and the strawberry-cherry, barely raspberry, has softened to the point that it is currently delivering all I ask in a good Spanish red; the acid, tannin and fruit to match up with a perfectly medium-rare Steak Fiorentina.
I AM a Grenache whore, but that said, there is really nothing NOT-to-like in my bottles in their present state.
I have 3 bottles left, which I will drink in the next 2-3 years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment