Pichon: Baron vs. Comtesse

Tasted Friday, May 7, 2010 by Loren Sonkin with 1,770 views

Introduction

Last night my tasting group met to compare the wines of Pichon Longueville, the Baron vs. Comtesse*. All wines were consumed blind over the course of a couple hours. The wines were popped and poured. I found it interesting that for myself, I rated the Baron wines ahead of the Comtesse with the exception of an under-performing 89. I had the Baron wines 1, 2, and 3 on my scorecard. All of the wines were good to great and certainly, there is some value to be found in both these houses compared to first growth pricing.

Flight 1 (2 Notes)

A couple of whites to start:

  • 2006 Château Thieuley Bordeaux Blanc Sec 87 Points

    France, Bordeaux

    A 50/50 blend of Sauvignon Blanc and Semillon. Golden color. The nose was nice with lime peel and a bit waxy. Also some dustiness. Nice on the palate, kind of citrusy. Decent acidity. Nice finish. A very pleasant opener.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2005 Château Rieussec R Flawed

    France, Bordeaux

    Not sure what happened here.I think an off bottle as I doubt this fell off the table this quickly. The nose was absent. A slight honeyed note maybe. On the palate, this is flabby and bitter with some diesel notes.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 2 (7 Notes)

In a weird quirk of fate, the wines were served blindly having all the Comtesse first followed by the Baron.

  • 1986 Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 91 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    The group liked this more than I. Ruby in color, cassis and leather on the nose. The palate is candied cherries. A bit of black jelly beans on the finish. No sign of age IMO. Not as complex as I would have thought, but seems like it has plenty of time. This seemed to be a love it or hate it wine. It got the most first place votes of any wine but finished #3 for the group.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1989 Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 93 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    I think everyone pegged this for a Comtesse and this was the groups WOTN. I really liked it, but apparently prefer the Baron wines. Ruby in color, slightly purple. The nose is earthy complex and very interesting. Lots of cherries and cassis. Juicy texture. On the palate, flavors of cherries dominate but also come cassis. You can note some maturity but this is still drinking youthfully. Long finish.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2004 Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande 90 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    Obviously the youngest wine in the group. Purple with some ruby hues. The nose has coffee, cherries and is very tight. Slightly dusty. On the palate, this is simple and one dimensional. Lots of black cherry fruit. Thick tannins. Seems like it has the stuffing to develop though. Not a great time to be opening this.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1989 Château Pichon-Longueville Baron 89 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    I don't think this bottle performed well for whatever reason. Too bad as this can be a great wine. Ruby/purple in color. the nose has tobacco, bell pepper but lacks much fruit. It is complex to drink and even has slight tannins. No detectable TCA, but its possible. For whatever reason, at 21 years, this bottle just didn't have it. It just drank too old. I liked the wine and this was more a case of being disappointed when it was unveiled than a truly bad wine.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1995 Château Pichon-Longueville Baron 95 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    Well if the 89 underperformed, this one over performed. Gorgeous nose that is earthy with tobacco, cassis and bell pepper. Complex on the palate. Firm tannins, but sweet black cherry and cassis fruit. Tightly layered. Long finish. My WOTN although this group was split on this.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2001 Château Pichon-Longueville Baron 93 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    I liked this far more than the group which surprised me. Purple/ruby in color. The nose has iodine, cigar ash, funk and cassis. Quite youthful but starting to emerge. Complex and delicious. Lots of black cherries. Nice finish. Needs some time.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1996 Château Pichon-Longueville Baron 93 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac

    A wine that everyone seemed to like but received no first place scores. Ruby in color, mostly clear and bright. The nose has funk and cassis with earthy undertones. On the palate, black cherries and tannins. Very tasty. Long finish.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 3 (2 Notes)

Some wines to finish:

  • 2007 Croft Porto Vintage 93 Points

    Portugal, Douro, Porto

    Inky purple in color. The nose was really interesting. It had a strong note of tequila that many of us picked up. I also got some chocolate covered raisins. This is big and fruity right now. Frankly, I thought ti was quite delicious. At the right price, I would be glad to drink it today. I am sure it develops over the next fifteen to thirty years, but it is compelling right now. Jeff K. said that he noted the tequila in many of the 07 Ports, but found this one more open than most of the ones he has tried.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2000 Churchill/Graham Porto Vintage 91 Points

    Portugal, Douro, Porto

    Purple in color. The nose has raspberries and dark chocolate. On the palate, more Raisinette candy. Nice finish. Not showing too much alcohol. Obviously young. Solid Port.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Closing

* Excerpted from http://www.pichon-lalande.com/uk/history/
The Baron Joseph de Pichon Longueville decided to share the domain between his five children. In a spirit of equality, he applied a very simple mathematical rule. His two sons would receive two fifths of the vineyard and its equipment, and his three daughters would receive the other three fifths. However, in the absence of descendants, only two children finally inherited the property: Raoul inherited the part destined for the sons, Virginie for the daughters.
After a period of several years during which the property was administered by the Baron Raoul de Pichon Longueville, the rupture was effective. From then on the lands of Pichon Longueville would have two very different futures.

Anticipating this indivision, Virginie married Count Henri de Lalande, and took over the control of the domain, the Count giving her independence and the title of Comtesse de Lalande. From 1840, wishing to remain in the heart of the Médoc on the land of Pichon Longueville, the ordered the Bordeaux architect, Duphot to design a residence inspired by the Hôtel de Lalande in Bordeaux where her husband had spent his childhood. Her passion for vines and the quality of her management made her a strong personality in the Médoc in the last century, leaving her mark on the domain that has kept her name.

×
×