Eric
Posts: 17326
Joined: 10/10/2003 From: Seattle, WA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JohnNezlek Why the opinions of this blogger and not those of one of the countless others? Why any at all? If I want his opinions, I know where I can find them. Well, it's my site, I respect Lyle's palate (especially when he is writing about the wines he likes), and that is enough for me... Seriously, I know not everyone will appreciate every channel. These channels are not a new development--I announced them rather broadly last October: http://www.cellartracker.com/newsletter/10-31-2007.htm This is just the latest installment. The feedback is appreciated, although the tone is, well, a bit strong... To respond to the other feedback, I will be looking into the following:: - Letting a user disable a specific channel.
- Perhaps alternate sorts. Right now it is sorted by date. I don't know that I would necessarily open up a full-blown interface to let you sort in a totally open way--but at least to pull the 'professional' sources like Tanzer above the 'blog' sources.
There will be more channels both from 'blog' type sources and from some heavyweight professional reviewers. And no, Parker and Spectator are not among the latter. They would prefer that CellarTracker fall off the face of the planet and are usually quite happy to let me know so. Of course, if you are a mutual customer you can let them know how you feel. FWIW, if any review source (Parker, Spectator, BurgHound) *wanted* their content here such that it was only availalable to people who pay them, well that just takes a few days of work (really just a few hours of coding and then a lot of mapping depending on the size of the database to integrate). However, despite the nearly 50,000 users here they seem to prefer to go their own way. So be it. My door is always open. I have been in touch with each many, many times...
_____________________________
Cheers! -Eric LeVine http://twitter.com/cellartracker http://facebook.com/cellartracker
|