Community Tasting Note
-
missatiejacket wrote:
May 6, 2013 - This really is an ususual Dom Perignon. It is ripe, rich, and round, and seems to be lacking a bit of acidity and much of the minerality that I usually find in other vintages of this wine. It is pleasant, but without nuance or subtlety at this point. Drinking it this young, I actually prefer this to more classic vintages such as 2002, but I don't think this will age and improve for nearly as long as such vintages. 2000 DP had some similarities to an extent, but this is much more extreme, and I am really surprised that they decided to release a 2003 as it is so contradictory to what I perceive as the house style. A forward DP, but not a very refined one. very good. I do like this wine, but there's a lot of Champagne that is just as good or better for much less money.
2 people found this helpful 6,708 views