Important Update From the Founder
Read message >
BWE: 1982 Bordeaux Retrospective
New York City: Fabio Piccolo Fiore
Tasted September 8, 2012 by dbg with 959 views
Introduction
Patrick did the heavy lifting to organize another of what has become a BWE tradition: an annual fall gathering in New York to review a particular Bordeaux vintage/vintages. We've done 1986, 1989, "lesser" vintages of the '80s, and the decade of the '70s. Work commitments have prevented me from attending the last two reviews, but the confluence of Patrick and Ian's return to NY and the opportunity to taste a selection of 1982s motivated me to do whatever it took to get back with this group. And boy was it worth it!
The usual suspects (Patrick, Ian, Jacques & Jill, Ramon, Chris & Marjorie, and Dale) were joined by a couple of Ian's financial world friends to bring our merry band to 11. The venue was a favorite standby for this event: Fabio Piccolo Fiore. We had the front room by the window, as usual, and the food and service, as usual, were fabulous.
Flight 1 (2 notes)
Champagnes
White - Sparkling
2004 L. Aubry Fils Champagne Le Nombre d'Or Brut Campanae Veteres Vites
Very pale, lots of mousse, minerally and steely on both the nose and palate, very dry, a bit short on the finish, this to me was the Chablis of Champagnes. Excellent. This was Dale's "geeky" Champagne contribution - geeky because the cepage contained more than the usual suspects of Pinot Noir, Pinot Meuniere and Chardonnay. There are an additional four (?) varieties allowed in Champagne, IF they were planted before the current rules went into effect, and the Aubrey contained a significant percentage of these grandfathered varieties. Here are the numbers: Pinot Meunier 5 %, Chardonnay 15%, Pinot Noir 20%, Fromenteau (Pinot Gris) 25%, Petit Meslier 20%, Arbanne 15%.
White - Sparkling
1996 Henriot Champagne Cuvée des Enchanteleurs Brut
Light gold color, nice bubbles, much richer nose of ripe stone fruits, fuller bodied than the Aubrey and more complex and powerful to my palate, with a bit of sweetness I don't usually associate with this wine but perhaps it's noticeable in comparison to the bone dry Aubrey. Moderately ling finish, outstanding. Many commented that this needed a food accompaniment, and indeed a bit held in reserve was a great match with lobster ravioli and crab appetizers.
1 person found this helpful
Comment
Flight 2 (3 notes)
White flight
White
1997 Trimbach Riesling Clos Ste. Hune
My first experience with this wine and I hope not my last. Very pale, minerally, bit of petrol in the nose (I like this - it adds complexity) made me think of German Riesling. Sharply focused on the palate with light to medium body and great balance, medium finish, outstanding.
White
1996 Château Pape Clément Blanc
Very pale, nose is a bit shy but I get more white fruits than citrus and a hint of what I call "naphtha" - a dry-cleaning-solvent-like note that sounds awful as I write it but which adds a bit of interest. Light bodied, doesn't seem to make a big impression on the palate, probably a very good to excellent wine but overshadowed by the others in this flight.
White
1999 Château de Beaucastel Châteauneuf-du-Pape Blanc Cuvée Roussanne Vieilles Vignes
This all-Roussanne cuvée has a reputation for going into an oxidized phase, only to emerge years later with great complexity. A bottle of 1995 we had at Jacque's earlier in the year was brown and totally shot, yet the color of its sibling from the same batch looks fine. A bottle of the 1999 I opened a few days ago appeared to be going in the same direction with golden hues and some sherry-field oxidation notes that mysteriously resolved into a nice complexity. I wanted the cumulative BWE wisdom to weigh in on this, so I brought this bottle to NY. This bottle was a totally different animal. Pale gold, rich nose, great power and balance on the palate with just a touch of the oily palate feel I associate with Rhone whites. Nice complexity, no hint of oxidation, medium-long finish. Outstanding. Problem is, these wines are like a box of chocolates. Until you open them, sniff and taste, you never know what you're going to get. Maybe the strange reports of some bottles being OTH and then others seeimingly miraculously behaving as is resurrected has more to do with bottle variation/premox, since the 1995 and 1999 both showed tremendous variation from one bottle to the next.
Flight 3 (3 notes)
Right Bankers
Red
1982 Château Certan de May
Dark red, lighter at rim but no bricking. Bit oh heat/alcohol on the nose at first, this blew off to allow a nice nose of earth, mushrooms, hints of blood and iodine to come forward. Medium body, nice fruit and complexity but not yet showing that sweet fully-mature profile, nice finish, excellent-outstanding, still young and should get better.
Red
1982 Château L'Evangile
Dark red core, minimal lightening. Dusty complex nose, almost too dusty/musty at first but soon developed into a wonderful olfactory treat, medium-full body, still tannic at first but this mellows, some iodine/blood notes, what really stands out is how this builds power and complexity through the mid palate and finish. A very "complete" wine, has many years ahead of it, outstanding to extraordinary.
Red
1982 Château Canon
Dark red core, lightening at rim. Sweetest/ripest nose in this flight. Fresh, young on the palate, a creamy texture, medium finish. This did not excite as much as the first two in the flight, came acros as youngest off the bunch, but still excellent. Tried a bit more at the end of the night and it had developed considerably more complexity, so it probably wasn't showing its best during the flight. This was a pop and pour, I think the others had been decanted ahead.
Flight 4 (3 notes)
St Juliens
Red
1982 Château Branaire (Duluc-Ducru)
Dark red, nice nose, medium body, good balance and finish. Still young. Excellent. My notes are sparse here as this did not make a large impact. The 1982 Branaire Dicru has a long BWE history. At BWE 2003 in NYC, it bested a stellar group, including Mouton, in a blind tasting put on by Tom Wheltle. Tim McCracken brought a bottle to the BWE event in Dubai early this year, where it showed well but not as well as the bottles Tom brought to NY in '03. This bottle was similar. Difference in provenance/storage?
Red
1982 Château Talbot
Dark red. Intense rich earthy funky Cordier nose but not dirty or barnyard. Medium + body, beginning complexity, excellent balance, very nice finish, still has years to go. Outstanding.
Red
1982 Château Gruaud Larose
Dark red. Wait, did I pour 2glasses of Talbot? The noses are almost identical with the rich earthy funk, but no, this is the Gruaud. They are twins on the nose, with perhaps a slight edge in intensity to the Talbot. But on the palate the Gruaud is richer, fuller, more powerful and complex, and with a longer finish than the Talbot. Not quite as complex and delppedvas the bottles Stuart brought to BWE Miami, this has room for additional development. Outstanding to extraordinary.
Flight 5 (3 notes)
Margaux
Red
1982 Château Margaux
Dark red to rim. Young and closed at first, but over 30 minutes in the glass opens to reveal a beautiful nose of Margaux-berries, great elegance and balance on the palate, beautiful finish but still really young. A great showing, will likely be better 10 years from now. Outstanding to extraordinary.
Red
1982 Château Prieuré-Lichine
Dark red care, lighter with some bricking at rim. Warm rich nose of Margaux-berries and flowers with some coffee/mocha notes were initially appealing. Softer and more diffused on the palate than the Margaux, medium finish, probably at peak, very good to excellent.
Red
1982 Château La Lagune
An Haut Medoc but close enough, it fit well in this flight and out- pointed the Prieure Lichine in this flight with a nice nose, good fruit, better focus and balance, and a nicer finish. Excellent.
Flight 6 (2 notes)
Pauillacs
Red
1982 Château Grand-Puy-Lacoste
Dark red, minimal lightening at rim. Coffee and roasted notes on the nose (a detraction for some, not for me), dark fruits, blood/iron and hints of iodine. Layered full palate feel, beginning complexity but not all the way there yet, excellent balance, long finish, has years to go, outstanding.
Red
1982 Château Batailley
Medium red, lighter at rim. Red berries, flowers on the nose, lighter palate impression, nice finish, seemed almost Burgundy-like in comparison to the rest of the reds. But not boring... Very good to excellent if atypical in this lineup.
Flight 7 (2 notes)
Sauternes
White - Sweet/Dessert
1986 Château Lafaurie-Peyraguey
Light honey. Crime brûlée nose including a hint of scorched sugar, rich ripe fruit, hint of bitterness on finish. Excellent.
White - Sweet/Dessert
1988 Château Climens
Light- medium honey. Rich sweet nose, white fruits and some botrytis. Rich palate-coating entry and mid-palate, ripe and sweet and perfectly balanced through to a long finish. I can almost still taste it this morning. Has many years to go. Extraordinary. A good thing we don't count dessert wines in WOTN voting as this would have given the Margaux a run for its money.
Closing
Wine of the flight honors went to: L'Evangile, Gruaud Larose, Margaux and Grand Puy Lacoste. The first two were far from unanimous, the last two were unanimous. Margaux won WOTN honors, with L'Evangile and Gruaud Larose very close at 2 and 3. We don't let the Sauuternes compete for WOTN. If we did, the Climens would have given the Margaux a run for it's money.
The end to another great BWE event. I know some shared my take on the wines but there were several alternate opinions as to which showed best. But all agreed that it was an excellent showing for almost all of the wines, without a single dud or corked bottle.