Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews. Learn more.
Manage Subscriptions
Important Update From the Founder
Read message >
Label borrowed from 2011
Label borrowed from 2009
Label borrowed from 2011
Label borrowed from 2011
Label borrowed from 2009
Label borrowed from 2009
Label borrowed from 2008
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2012
Label borrowed from 2007
Label borrowed from 2007
Label borrowed from 2013
Label borrowed from 2013
Label borrowed from 2014
Label borrowed from 2014
Label borrowed from 2014
Label borrowed from 2014
Label borrowed from 2014
Community Tasting Notes 27
-
RieslingFanatic wrote:
March 25, 2017 - More mature nose than the '14 (tried immidiately before). Red cherries,. spice, dirt/earth and oak. Touch oxidative too. OK.
-
aChave wrote: 87 points
March 9, 2017 - A very pleasant, light-weight Bourgogne. Refined rather than rustic style. Not complex, but very easy to drink. No tannins to take note of. Works well with light, uncomplicated food.
-
sawira wrote: 86 points
September 29, 2016 - More spine and verve than the '11. Still fairly uninspiring, but an adequate drink with food. Light. Will last 7-10 more years, and may benefit from a couple more years in cellar, but is it worth the cellar space?
1 person found this helpful Comment -
sawira wrote: 86 points
March 15, 2016 - Bottle #3 of 6. PnP, then over two nights. Beautiful Burgundy robe, classic color, some beginning lightening of rim. Simple, light, short finish, excellent flavor profile. Never really did much other than be a good, basic generic Bourgogne rouge. I wonder if this is still young and tight. No sign of any decline over the two evenings.
1 person found this helpful Comment -
aChave wrote: 88 points
February 17, 2016 - Pretty consistent with previous note. Open, light, bright, red-cherry with some nice dark berry nuances. Quite enjoyable; uncomplicated, but not intending to be anything else. Round, light fragrance, attractive. Good quality. Good for current drinking within the next year or so.
1 person found this helpful Comment
1 - 5 of 27
More notes
Pro Reviews 2
Add a Pro ReviewBurghound
-
By Allen Meadows
January 2012, Issue #45 (link)(Domaine Joseph Faiveley Bourgogne - Joseph Faiveley Red) Subscribe to see review text.
RJonWine.com
-
By Richard Jennings
9/14/2013 (link) 88 points(Faiveley Pinot Noir Bourgogne) Dark cherry red color with pale meniscus; sous bois, tart red fruit, cranberry nose; tasty, tart cherry, cranberry, saline, mineral, tart strawberry palate; medium-plus finish 88+ points
Wine Definition
- Vintage 2010
- Type Red
- Producer Faiveley
- Varietal Pinot Noir
- Designation n/a
- Vineyard n/a
- Country France
- Region Burgundy
- SubRegion n/a
- Appellation Bourgogne
- UPC Codes 089744758033, 3351000181013, 3351000181211
Community Holdings
- Pending Delivery 3 (1%)
- In Cellars 45 (20%)
- Consumed 181 (79%)
Food Pairing
Community Recommendations
Roast Chicken Filled with Sausage and Pecan Stuffing, Roasted Pork Loin, Spaghetti and meatballsWho Likes This Wine
100% Like It 6 votes
More About This Wine
Articles
- ProducerFaiveley
- VarietyPinot Noir
- CountryFrance
- RegionBurgundy
- AppellationBourgogne
Add Articles
- Wine2010 Faiveley Pinot Noir Bourgogne (add)
- FamilyFaiveley Pinot Noir Bourgogne (add)
- ProducerFaiveley
- VarietalPinot Noir
- CountryFrance
- RegionBurgundy
- AppellationBourgogne